radarlove
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2005
- Posts
- 677
RedDogC130 said:I would put my money on a newly winged military pilot over a civilian trained new commercial pilot from the best schools in America any day of the week. I have the advantage to have gone through one of those great programs and I know the standards and experience they train to.
One of the big civ/mil differences is that the civilian guys don't spend quite so much time explaining how good they are.
BTW, I hate to hit a sore spot, but this might be good for you in the long run. Do you think perhaps that any of your attitude came out in the interview?
I'm not saying this to hit below the belt, because I'm sure you're a fine person and horribly dissapointed. But still, I read your message and felt compelled to reply, since (to my eyes) it oozed pomposity. Two messages later, you explain how you really meant it. D'oh!
A little humility goes a long way, just ask a F-teen driver during his first hour in a B737 simulator. And yes, even those "best of the best" often require extra training sessions, even though they went through the training program you brag about.
The civ/mil debate is fueled quite often by statements like yours.
In this business, experience, intelligence and situational awareness are all that count. I don't care how good an ab-initio program is, you still have those three factors that count and none of them can be replaced by training.
If you read the bestseller "blink" which explains how so much of what we do/decisions that we make never make it to a cognitive center of the brain, but are instead subconcious and immediate (think "hot stove") you'll start to understand why experience is so important and sought after. You can explain to a student on a chalk board all day long what a "flare" is, but good luck getting a good one out of him the first try.