Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

United may ground 757-300 and 767-200 to curb fuel cost

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
They already did that, John.

SCR

Actually there have been 7 airfare bumps this year already. Then again, my job is to fly the plane. We have Ivy league geniuses to make the big decisions and they get paid 100's of millions of dollars to do so, even if they are dead wrong.

The longer I'm in this industry the more I believe it's a giant pyramid scheme.
 
That was author's speculation, not the company word. I'm not saying that couldn't happen but a big assumption at this point. I still speculate that since over 50% of the domestic reduction will come from regional flying, the 50 seaters with the highest CASM will depart first.

Wouldn't the airlines all be fly A380s if CASM is what really mattered?

The RJs are everywhere because their cost to revenue per seat is better than a larger airplane. You can keep the ticket prices pretty high when you only have to sell 50 seats.

Scott
 
Wouldn't the airlines all be fly A380s if CASM is what really mattered?

The RJs are everywhere because their cost to revenue per seat is better than a larger airplane. You can keep the ticket prices pretty high when you only have to sell 50 seats.
Sort of.

The original economic justification for RJ's was based upon $25-$30 oil. At $100 it's pretty hard not get upside down on the RASM/CASM curve with the mighty RJ. There will always be certain markets (or time of day frequencies) where 50-70 seats is the perfect size but there is a very good reason why every single major airline is in the process of downsizing their "express" fleets.

Besides, as the domestic market matures any capacity-limited RASM advantage vaporizes when somebody else parks a 737 at the next gate.
 
Last edited:
Southwest loves RJs, (painted in competitor's colors). Like printing money. Not hard to compete against a low quality, high CASM regional operator. If given the choice with me paying, I'd fly Southwest versus sitting on an RJ. Over 50% of domsetic flying is being outsourced to regional airlines,. Southwest is kicking legacy airline butt domestically. Coincidence? You be the judge.

Just look at the Allegiant business model. By pass hubs and capture traffic that would be forced to ride on an RJ to a hub. I saw a map of the USA when they had 9 airplanes, They identified over 300 cities under served by mainline type jets, with only RJ service to hubs. Fast forward to today, 40 plus airframes and growing.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top