Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

United Flt 93 CVR Transcript

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Tejas-Jet said:
Or until a blonde haired, red blooded, blue eyed American knocks on my door wanting those jobs....but he better be price competitive.

Tejas

Dump the welfare system and see how many Americans can suddenly find work.
 
Something for all of you to keep in mind. If you are one who watches the 9/11 tapes or listens to the CVRs on a regular basis, how long will it be before you become de-sensitized to what you are watching? How long will it be before watching it doesn't evoke the same feelings it does today? Don't say never, because I'm guessing 10 years ago you would never have said that a 9/11 would happen.

It is possible to remember exactly how one felt that day without constantly subjecting oneself to reminders. Trust me, if I wake up tomorrow and learn that Bin Laden is dead, I will jump for joy and praise whichever one of our brave soldiers did it.
 
flyer172r said:
Something for all of you to keep in mind. If you are one who watches the 9/11 tapes or listens to the CVRs on a regular basis, how long will it be before you become de-sensitized to what you are watching? How long will it be before watching it doesn't evoke the same feelings it does today? Don't say never, because I'm guessing 10 years ago you would never have said that a 9/11 would happen.

It is possible to remember exactly how one felt that day without constantly subjecting oneself to reminders. Trust me, if I wake up tomorrow and learn that Bin Laden is dead, I will jump for joy and praise whichever one of our brave soldiers did it.

I think very few regularly watch such horror. I haven't personally seen a single one of the "beheading" tapes, or the "Juba the Sniper" tapes. It makes me sick and angry. I think anyone who gets their jollies watching videotaped death is already desensitized and a bit off in the noggin already.

Every so often, some clod will ask for a source for live CVR of a fatal accident, and I'll be the first to say "What the H3ll do you need a tape for? If you MUST, get a transcript if your true desire is to learn." I've heard more than one in training and it's horrible.
 
jayme said:
Repeat after me: Saddam had NOTHING TO DO WITH 9/11.

Not true. Saddam may not have been directly involved in 9-11, at least not in any way that we know of, but it is not true to say that he had nothing to do with it. Saddam had a long history of supporting terrorist groups. Al Qaeda was but one of these.

In fact, Bush never claimed that Saddam collaborated on 9-11.
http://www.factcheck.org/article203.html

But that is only part of why we are in Iraq.

We are in Iraq because he also had a WMD program. The big lie is that we did not find evidence of WMDs or Saddam's research program. The Iraq Survery Group (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Survey_Group) reported that Iraq had numerous development programs for banned weapons and was maneuvering to end sanctions to restart those programs in earnest. They also had systems to procure items for weapons development that were banned under the sanctions.

The only thing that we didn't find was stockpiles of weapons, and that has been what the media and Democrat furor has been over. They would lead you to believe that we found nothing. They lie.

The big question is what happened to the stockpiles that we knew existed, but did not find. My belief is that they were moved somewhere friendly. (Syria, I'm looking in your direction.) After all, in the 12 year "rush to war," Saddam had ample time to hide and relocate his stockpiles.

The combination of WMDs and terror ties is dangerous. It is even more dangerous now with Iran, because President Mahmoud sees that the Democrats and liberal care more about regaining power than about truth, victory, and security. He is emboldened by that. A bold madman with a nuclear weapon is very dangerous indeed. Mark my words, he will not be deterred by negotiations.
 
Last edited:
fastbird said:
Jayme said: "Repeat after me: Saddam had NOTHING TO DO WITH 9/11."

Where is your proof? There is just as much circumstancial evidence to prove he was involved as there is to claim he wasn't.

We know:
1. The UN's Oil for Food program was rife with corruption
2. Saddam was skimming money from the program by selling black market oil
3. Many corrupt officials in his regime also sold oil on the black market
4. Saddam funded $25k "job well done" gifts to families of suicide bombers
5. Saddam's closest and most corrupt lieutenants had ties to OBL, Hamas, etc.
6. Saddam had chemical weapons (WMD's) and used them against Iran
7. Saddam had chemical weapons (WMD's) and used them against Iraqis
8. Saddam had plenty of warning to move incriminating equipment before 4/2003
9. Saddam's lieutenants repeated thwarted UN inspectors in the 1990's.

If I've got this right...
Saddam had the desire, technology, money, and proven ability to channel desparately needed funds or fraudulent passports to the ilk who would bomb a Night Club in Bali, or hijack four airliners, or bomb shopping malls and hotels.

Yep, Saddam had nothing to promoting Radical Islamic Terrorism. I'm convinced.

In legal terms that is "probable cause" in terms of a search and "motive" at the trial.
 
Benhuntn said:
furlough boy unless you are one of them (which I suspect) you aren't giving up any freedoms. But you would be at the head of the line demanding why we didn't do more to stop them if there is another attack. The ARENA of the real world is no place for the weak, timid, pablum eating tree hugging cowards that sit snug in their bedroom with their heads under the pillow hoping the bad guys won't see them.

...the ones like h25b (who decided not to take up the opportunity to serve)?
 
or...the ones like President Bush?
Chaney?
Rice?
Just wondering...these are the very people who fit the definition in the above post...
 
fastbird said:
I can't believe the pansy arsed liberals who think we can all get along and sing Kumbya while holding hands and the world really is a nice place with people who can be reasoned with. Keep the memories of 9/11 alive, in fact keep remembering the devastation. Listen to the people pleading for help on those tapes. Keep your ire and never forget what those butchers did and remember the parties in the streets in the sympathetic countries!

There is only one way to deal with the ilk who would cowardly attack civilians by hijacking airplanes, buses, detonating remote bombings or such...and it comes in various sizes...5.56, 7.62, .40, .45, or even .50...calibre that is.

Kill them all and let them find their Allah and all his grandure. BTW, here's your Religion of Peace...

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

...funny...they (the ones you want to kill) think just like you!
 
I just wondered across this thread.

I'm glad MOST Americans still love our country and the socialists who have recently taken over the Democratic Party, is still the minority.

One final thought...

We are winning the war on the ground in Afghanistan and Iraq but we are losing the war in the mainstream media, right here on our soil. Pathetic!
 
So only conservatives love this country? FKN laughable. Did it ever occur to you that we tree hugging liberals love this country DESPITE it's mistakes. Did it ever occur to you that we want to correct those mistakes in order to make this country even better?

Go ahead and be blindly led down this fcked up path. I'll continue to bitch about it and maybe if there are enough of us we can make a change for the better.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top