Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

UND owned Citation has double engine failure, none hurt.

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Cutlass1287 said:
The word around the airport is "icing," but I dont see how icing could have anything to do with it....

Could be, it would require the pilots having their head up their rear and letting the nacelles Ice up before turning on the heat. Then when they did get hot, ejecting the ice into the engines and tearing up the turbine.
 
Anyone remember the Options BE-400 that had a dual flameout over the gulf? They got one engine restarted and landed safely. Fuel exhaustion was not the cause, but haven't heard if they ever determined what was.
 
UND jet makes emergency landing

GRAND FORKS, N.D.(AP) - A University of North Dakota research jet with four
people on board made a successful emergency landing after the engines quit,
the university said.

The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating Friday's incident
near Fairbanks, Alaska, UND said.

The Citation II research jet from the university's Atmospheric Science
Department was lost from radar contact during a study of icing conditions,
according to a release from UND.

When the department's chief research pilot, Paul Le Hardy, was unable to
restart the engines, he maneuvered the jet into a successful emergency
landing about 70 miles north of Fairbanks.

UND spokesman Peter Johnson said two other occupants are researchers with
UND. The fourth person on board is a researcher with Sikorsky, a company
that designs helicopters.

"Given the weather conditions and the formidable terrain in Alaska, the safe
landing of the aircraft without injury to the crew was a remarkable display
of airmanship on the part of the pilot," said Dr. Bruce Smith, Dean of UND's
John D. Odegard School of Aerospace Sciences.
 
KeroseneSnorter said:
Lot of time in a 550 here, Barring any volcanic ash or birds (unlikely on the ash, birds possible but not mentioned so probably not) I would throw a $100 bill down and bet either fuel contamination, or they ran it dry.


You can mail the $100 bill to me, I don't take checks.:D
 
English said:
You can mail the $100 bill to me, I don't take checks.:D

Ahhh, but I have yet to see a cause stated anywhere! By the time the NTSB actually makes a ruling on this puppy chances are that my 100 bill will only be worth 10 bucks due to inflation!;)


Icing study doesn't tell you much. Either they had a double bleed failure and could not heat the engines for some reason(or forgot to, which I find unlikely), or it was Fuel problems, based on what we have so far.

No, me thinks that my 100 bucks is safe for a bit longer!:D
 
English said:
You can mail the $100 bill to me, I don't take checks.:D
Is it too late for me to get in on that bet also?
 
KeroseneSnorter said:
Icing study doesn't tell you much.
No, and in the first article, they were said to be looking for places for the icing studies, not actually conducting the icing studies atteh time. And the icing studies will involve a helicopter, if I understand correctly. So, you're right, the mention of icing studies doesn't shed much light on the cause of the engine failures
 
This is strictly second hand info but word has it they had a chunk of ice break of the nose and then both the engines injested it.

There is a video floating around showing UND's Citation after landing after one of their experiments with icing, the amount of ice on it was unbelievable,
I can't believe it flew.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top