IronCityBlue
Blue member (hey wait...)
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2006
- Posts
- 638
blame game II
Man I hope Surplus1 doesn't come after me for copyright infringement for this annoyingly long multipage post! :erm:
We stopped it during our last "negotiation" when Judge Wedoff had a loaded gun to our heads and our management wanted to split the airline in half AND have >70 seat RJ's flown by our regionals. They got neither. Expect more in '09.
If the situation was as precarious as you say, why didn't management simply do it? What stopped them? The pay cuts? The pension dump? Those were happening anyway were they not? So how exactly was further outsourcing stopped? While the answer to that question may serve as a nice history lesson, it in no way will refute my original contention. The loosening of scope is a one way check valve. On any given day it will either be loosened or it will remain the same. It will never, EVER be reversed, even in the best of times, because no legacy pilot group will pay to fight that fight. 2009 will come and go and, best case, you will be right where you are now with scope. You will never see an E170/175/RJ700/705 and many others at mainline.
ALPA does a lot of good. ALPA has done some bad. I chalk the whole RJ scope thing in the latter category. Now it's just damage control.
Agree to outsource the narrowbody baby-9's and Fokkers to the lowest bidding ACMI lift provider/subcontractors in existance then blame start up LCC's narrowbody pay scales for destroying the profession. Yes, I agree, we can chalk that up in the latter category.
I'd agree with it too. Maybe you JetBlue guys ought to lead the charge on that one? You can serve as an example for the rest of the non-union carriers.
There is talk of a union at JB, both ALPA and in house. ALPA was even gaining some monentum until the Airways integration fiasco. Again, another 20 page thread all by itself, but bottom line is I'd put the over/under on it happening this year now at around 35-40% ALPA, 49-60% in house. Just my swag though. Either way we did make improvements this year, and we will have a review of the industry towards the end of the year for another comparison. We are not where we need to be yet, but we are light years ahead of where we were when we started, and where VA and SB are now.
That's because they had to [match/undercut start up/LCC rates] or they wouldn't have been able to compete with the JetBlue, Airtran's, and Frontier's of the world with their discount airline pilot rates.
Again, what's different now? There have ALWAYS been start up/LCC's of the world, including the now pilot pay saviors Southwest, who for decades worked longer and harder for less. Why is it now all the sudden, every legacy is capped by the pay of every new start up? I mean, I can see why its in the management playbook to preach that, but why are so many pilots all the sudden believeing it?
So if ALPA hadn't "signed off on every single concessionary deal" to bring our hourly rates DOWN TO YOURS, we'd be out of business because we'd be slowly bleeding to death to the tune of about 1B a year. Get it?
Got it. Its JB rates. And to think for a moment I though that billion dollar swing had to do with fuel prices almost trippling, the dot com 90's going "poof", the last minute business traveller willing to pay anything anytime out of his unlimited travel expense account going away and a recession, a war and a new security paradigm burden the likes of which our nation had never seen. I now see it is primarily our fault. It is we who set the pay ceiling, and you who set the floor.
In any case, good discussion. Its nice when we can hash out issues, and even point a few fingers when appropriate, while still keeping it civil even as we both sit here scratchig our heads wondering what's the best way to restore and secure our segment of this insane industry.
Man I hope Surplus1 doesn't come after me for copyright infringement for this annoyingly long multipage post! :erm:
We stopped it during our last "negotiation" when Judge Wedoff had a loaded gun to our heads and our management wanted to split the airline in half AND have >70 seat RJ's flown by our regionals. They got neither. Expect more in '09.
If the situation was as precarious as you say, why didn't management simply do it? What stopped them? The pay cuts? The pension dump? Those were happening anyway were they not? So how exactly was further outsourcing stopped? While the answer to that question may serve as a nice history lesson, it in no way will refute my original contention. The loosening of scope is a one way check valve. On any given day it will either be loosened or it will remain the same. It will never, EVER be reversed, even in the best of times, because no legacy pilot group will pay to fight that fight. 2009 will come and go and, best case, you will be right where you are now with scope. You will never see an E170/175/RJ700/705 and many others at mainline.
ALPA does a lot of good. ALPA has done some bad. I chalk the whole RJ scope thing in the latter category. Now it's just damage control.
Agree to outsource the narrowbody baby-9's and Fokkers to the lowest bidding ACMI lift provider/subcontractors in existance then blame start up LCC's narrowbody pay scales for destroying the profession. Yes, I agree, we can chalk that up in the latter category.
I'd agree with it too. Maybe you JetBlue guys ought to lead the charge on that one? You can serve as an example for the rest of the non-union carriers.
There is talk of a union at JB, both ALPA and in house. ALPA was even gaining some monentum until the Airways integration fiasco. Again, another 20 page thread all by itself, but bottom line is I'd put the over/under on it happening this year now at around 35-40% ALPA, 49-60% in house. Just my swag though. Either way we did make improvements this year, and we will have a review of the industry towards the end of the year for another comparison. We are not where we need to be yet, but we are light years ahead of where we were when we started, and where VA and SB are now.
That's because they had to [match/undercut start up/LCC rates] or they wouldn't have been able to compete with the JetBlue, Airtran's, and Frontier's of the world with their discount airline pilot rates.
Again, what's different now? There have ALWAYS been start up/LCC's of the world, including the now pilot pay saviors Southwest, who for decades worked longer and harder for less. Why is it now all the sudden, every legacy is capped by the pay of every new start up? I mean, I can see why its in the management playbook to preach that, but why are so many pilots all the sudden believeing it?
So if ALPA hadn't "signed off on every single concessionary deal" to bring our hourly rates DOWN TO YOURS, we'd be out of business because we'd be slowly bleeding to death to the tune of about 1B a year. Get it?
Got it. Its JB rates. And to think for a moment I though that billion dollar swing had to do with fuel prices almost trippling, the dot com 90's going "poof", the last minute business traveller willing to pay anything anytime out of his unlimited travel expense account going away and a recession, a war and a new security paradigm burden the likes of which our nation had never seen. I now see it is primarily our fault. It is we who set the pay ceiling, and you who set the floor.
In any case, good discussion. Its nice when we can hash out issues, and even point a few fingers when appropriate, while still keeping it civil even as we both sit here scratchig our heads wondering what's the best way to restore and secure our segment of this insane industry.
Last edited: