Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

UA furlough numbers released

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I totally agree that the 65 thing sucks but that is old business. I am just looking to find a way to keep my job over the next 6-12 months because of all of this furloughing crap.

Age 65 OLD NEWS? The time frame you are referring to is only a 6 to 12 month reference.

AGE 65 is fresh. And those that are responsible need to pay just as those that are being hurt by AGE 65 are paying.
 
Time out...

Hi Eagles,

I am sorry if you didnt recognize the generalisation. By and far, most of us are done with the major expenditures once we (hopefully) reach 60. Chances are that those furloughed are still having to meet obligations that the 60 year olds no longer remember.

Sincerely,

dane
 
Hell, at CAL, our lines are built around 90+ hours. That's what I've been doing since I was hired. Last summer I got credit for 117 hours, 98, and 104 hours. Something has got to give. I'm going for a LOA from pure exhaustion.
 
It's time to DRILL FOR MORE OIL off our own coasts... Solar won't cut it for at least another 10 years...

And destroy the coastline for two years worth of oil? I don't think so. We need to reduce our consumption of oil, not drill for more. There's enough in that ********************hole of a desert for all of us without drilling the in the oceans surrounding the US.
 
And destroy the coastline for two years worth of oil? I don't think so. We need to reduce our consumption of oil, not drill for more. There's enough in that ********************hole of a desert for all of us without drilling the in the oceans surrounding the US.

Destroy the coastline???:confused: How so? Most people wouldn't even notice the rigs IF they could even see them. Drilling for oil WONT "Destroy" the coastlines. That's a tree-hugger~drama queen comment.:p
 
And destroy the coastline for two years worth of oil? I don't think so. We need to reduce our consumption of oil, not drill for more. There's enough in that ********************hole of a desert for all of us without drilling the in the oceans surrounding the US.
Amen brother.

I live in Florida and don't want my East and West coasts polluted by yet another Exxon accident.

To all those who think drilling is the answer --> Let me ask you this: What are you going to do after that resource is depleted? What is your plan then?

You can't just hope somebody will come up with a miracle. You have to make it happen...now.

If the price of oil suddenly came down dramatically, how soon do you think it would be before all those Hummer and Ford Excursion TV ads would reappear?

We need a Manhattan-style project started immediately to find a permanent energy source that is unlimited, pollution-free, and will not contribute one bit to Global Warming. In the meantime, we have to conserve like there's no tomorrow and force the automakers to implement drastically improved CAFE standards...within the next 5 years, not 20.

Obama has already proposed such a plan to deal with this problem once and for all. You won't get any of that from union-hating McCain.

Republicans have no answer except to drill...drill...drill so their buddies and lobbyists in Big Oil can get richer...richer...richer.

Progressive leadership is what we need and what will get us through this.

Vote Obama '08!
 
If Norway is able to do it with ZERO pollution, then we can. I say DRILL the gulf coast and kill the dolphins.....:nuts:
 
Do it all! Drill, invest heavily in alternative fuels, and get this country off our knees when it comes to OIL.
 
Hi Eagles,

I am sorry if you didnt recognize the generalisation. By and far, most of us are done with the major expenditures once we (hopefully) reach 60. Chances are that those furloughed are still having to meet obligations that the 60 year olds no longer remember.

Sincerely,

dane

Your arguemants are good if we were still in the 70's or 80's but as you know we are not. There are an awful lot of pilots out there who had to start over later in their career due to airline failures. There are hundreds of ex TWA, EAL, PAA at United who have not had the idealistic career you are referring to.
It's not a good situation but it is now reality.
 
Here we go again!

Rumor is Skywest is going to offer the J4J deal like they did after 9/11. Apparently United wants to increase CRJ-700 by 13% to cover all of the 737's they are parking. This industry sucks, it aint ever goin to be the same.
 
Amen brother.

I live in Florida and don't want my East and West coasts polluted by yet another Exxon accident.

The Exxon accident was caused by an oil tanker accident. Almost all oil spills are caused by oil tankers. Drilling off the coast of Florida would involve pipelines. There was no oil spilled from Gulf of Mexico oil platforms after Hurricane Katrina. Your insistence on no domestic oil drilling will keep us dependent on imported oil, that arrives via tanker


To all those who think drilling is the answer --> Let me ask you this: What are you going to do after that resource is depleted? What is your plan then?

We have years of oil available. Worldwide, we continue to discover vast new reservoirs of petroleum. The environmentalist left has been crying wolf on the impending end of oil supplies for over 30 years.

You can't just hope somebody will come up with a miracle. You have to make it happen...now.

Exactly right! We have the technology NOW for clean energy (nuclear). We have the technology NOW for a 25% increase in fuel economy without reducing range, vehicle size or comfort (clean diesel technology). Unfortunately, every solution other than a reduced standard of living and more govt control of our lives is unacceptable to the environmental left

If the price of oil suddenly came down dramatically, how soon do you think it would be before all those Hummer and Ford Excursion TV ads would reappear?

God help us if consumers are allowed the freedom to buy the vehicles they want. We, the anointed ones, should be making those decisions for the unwashed masses.


We need a Manhattan-style project started immediately to find a permanent energy source that is unlimited, pollution-free, and will not contribute one bit to Global Warming. In the meantime, we have to conserve like there's no tomorrow and force the automakers to implement drastically improved CAFE standards...within the next 5 years, not 20.

No solution other than less freedom and lower living standards will please the environmental left. There is no such thing as free energy, there will always be environmental costs associated with the production of energy. I don't even want to get started on global warming hysteria

Obama has already proposed such a plan to deal with this problem once and for all. You won't get any of that from union-hating McCain.

Show me one thing in Obama's plan that will produce one kilowatt of energy or one gallon of gas. He proposes nothing but a continuing energy crisis that only more government and higher taxes can solve.


Republicans have no answer except to drill...drill...drill so their buddies and lobbyists in Big Oil can get richer...richer...richer.

Yeah Yeah Yeah, lets throw in the typical class warfare angle. We're gonna get them evil rich people. Problem is we're all rich in their minds.


Progressive leadership is what we need and what will get us through this.
"Progressive leadership", another term for socialism. If we all can't be happy, at least we can all be miserable together.


Vote Obama '08!

No comment required
 
Amen brother.

I live in Florida and don't want my East and West coasts polluted by yet another Exxon accident.

The Exxon accident was caused by an oil tanker accident. Almost all oil spills are caused by oil tankers. Drilling off the coast of Florida would involve pipelines. There was no oil spilled from Gulf of Mexico oil platforms after Hurricane Katrina. Your insistence on no domestic oil drilling will keep us dependent on imported oil, that arrives via tanker


To all those who think drilling is the answer --> Let me ask you this: What are you going to do after that resource is depleted? What is your plan then?

We have years of oil available. Worldwide, we continue to discover vast new reservoirs of petroleum. The environmentalist left has been crying wolf on the impending end of oil supplies for over 30 years.

You can't just hope somebody will come up with a miracle. You have to make it happen...now.

Exactly right! We have the technology NOW for clean energy (nuclear). We have the technology NOW for a 25% increase in fuel economy without reducing range, vehicle size or comfort (clean diesel technology). Unfortunately, every solution other than a reduced standard of living and more govt control of our lives is unacceptable to the environmental left

If the price of oil suddenly came down dramatically, how soon do you think it would be before all those Hummer and Ford Excursion TV ads would reappear?

God help us if consumers are allowed the freedom to buy the vehicles they want. We, the anointed ones, should be making those decisions for the unwashed masses.


We need a Manhattan-style project started immediately to find a permanent energy source that is unlimited, pollution-free, and will not contribute one bit to Global Warming. In the meantime, we have to conserve like there's no tomorrow and force the automakers to implement drastically improved CAFE standards...within the next 5 years, not 20.

No solution other than less freedom and lower living standards will please the environmental left. There is no such thing as free energy, there will always be environmental costs associated with the production of energy. I don't even want to get started on global warming hysteria

Obama has already proposed such a plan to deal with this problem once and for all. You won't get any of that from union-hating McCain.

Show me one thing in Obama's plan that will produce one kilowatt of energy or one gallon of gas. He proposes nothing but a continuing energy crisis that only more government and higher taxes can solve.


Republicans have no answer except to drill...drill...drill so their buddies and lobbyists in Big Oil can get richer...richer...richer.

Yeah Yeah Yeah, lets throw in the typical class warfare angle. We're gonna get them evil rich people. Problem is we're all rich in their minds.


Progressive leadership is what we need and what will get us through this.
"Progressive leadership", another term for socialism. If we all can't be happy, at least we can all be miserable together.


Vote Obama '08!

No comment required


AMEN TO THAT!!!

Yeah, Obama...that's the answer to it all. I hear his wife is really nice too... She will have nothing but a good impact on the world with her open and forgiving views of the United States and how "the man" has kept her down year after year.
 
1) Some have offered that Ted Turner's land buying spree in the West was not to have nature conservation (i.e., Bison), but rather to secure rights to anything that may be below his 2+ million acres or whatever he has.

2) On the flip, when the 2B furloughed guys/gals get on in years, they'll have the option of flying the extra 5 years to lessen the long-term impact of the current trends. I bet if you snap-shotted a cross section of pilots in favor of Age-65, results would be age-stratified. The only pissed people are those who have to wait 5 more years to upgrade (perhaps), though when the same turn 60, I doubt they'll hang up their wings (so much for principle).
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom