- Joined
- Aug 18, 2005
- Posts
- 2,507
Sniper Bob said:Fuel vapors in the center fuel tank were ignited by a shorted-out wire -- AFTER IT WAS SLICED IN TWO BY A MISSLE!!!
LOL
CE
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sniper Bob said:Fuel vapors in the center fuel tank were ignited by a shorted-out wire -- AFTER IT WAS SLICED IN TWO BY A MISSLE!!!
Because there was no missle strike.bocefus said:Sooo, anyone care to explain why the recovered wreckage shows no evidence of a missile strike?
That seems about right.Prop2Jet said:aliens zapped it by accident, then the Navy tried shooting the mother ship, missed and hit a small 182 flown by a terrorist who was trying to TWA 800. Both planes plunged into the ocean, the mother ship warped outta there and the FBI came and took the black boxes from the NTSB because the Mother ship was talked about on the tapes.
siucavflight said:That seems about right.
All of these conspiracy theroist are nuts. There would have to be too many people that would have to keep a secret, it would never work. Two people who know would be one too many.
Funny, sounds like the same opinion as the TWA chief pilot!Fuel vapors in the center fuel tank were ignited by a shorted-out wire -- AFTER IT WAS SLICED IN TWO BY A MISSLE!!!
thats pretty funny, I see your avatar right there. how long was that program black?
Waste of money? I guess you could lump a whole bunch of NTSB suggested saftety upgrades into that category. Gee, I wonder why the military doesn't think GN2 fuel tank inerting systems are a waste of money?Something else funny is that the "official" reason for the explosion, this fuel tank issue, has never been fixed. Wonder why? Hint: It would be a waste of money.