Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

TSA "Furloughs" 3000 Screeners.

  • Thread starter Thread starter JJay
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 7

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

JJay

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 18, 2003
Posts
58
Ya gotta love this!

Today: March 27, 2003 at 17:05:13 PST

Government to Cut 3,000 Airport Screeners
By LESLIE MILLER
ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON (AP) - As many as 3,000 airport screeners could lose their jobs this spring as the government reassesses the size of the work force that it brought to full strength only last November.

The head of the Transportation Security Administration, James Loy, told a House Appropriations subcommittee that he wants to reduce the number of screeners from 54,000 to 51,000 - cutting about one in 18 - and that layoff notices could begin going out April 1.

By October 2004, the government plans to have 48,000 screeners, with reductions through attrition and other steps, an agency spokesman said later.

The chairman of the homeland security panel said that at Groton/New London Airport in Connecticut, 26 federal screeners check an average of one passenger every five hours. Rep. Harold Rogers, R-Kentucky, estimates screeners at a third of U.S. airports check an average of three passengers an hour.

The effort to trim the screening work force comes as Congress scrutinizes Loy's agency, now in its second year of existence. Lawmakers say they want to make sure the agency is doing what Congress intended, including tightening security for the transportation system.

Rogers said he is disappointed by what he said was the agency's emphasis on aviation security at the expense of highways, railroads, pipelines and ports.

"You need to take a good hard look at our border and transportation systems," Rogers told Loy. "If we have a weakness, it will be found."

Other lawmakers said they were concerned about holes in security in public transit systems and cargo shipping.

On Wednesday, the chairman of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation's subcommittee on aviation said he intends to review the agency's security measures at airports and on planes.

Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., has suggested moving federal air marshals to coach so airlines do not lose revenue from first-class seats. He also thinks airports may need to be given more flexibility in protecting themselves from terrorist attacks.

Rogers has been a strong critic of the agency's staffing levels, which Congress capped at 45,000 full-time positions last year. Despite the cap, the agency hired 9,000 temporary employees, most of whom had five-year contracts.

---

On the Net:

http://www.tsa.gov
 
JJay said:

Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., has suggested moving federal air marshals to coach so airlines do not lose revenue from first-class seats.

Yeah.....that'll do it! First-class is all non-rev anymore anyway! I didn't even know the marshalls were all in the first class cabin! Yeah, I'm in the wrong business!
 
The reason for a FAM to be in first class is so he can get between the towelhead and the cockpit door. Wouldn't make much sense to have him in 45F if above mentioned shiite head is in either first class or first few rows of coach.
 
Political correctness police

Towellhead?...shiitehead???,
I think what the gentleman meant to say was "peacefully challenged" and "intellectually deprived"!!!

Learguy
 
ATR-Driver, not to argue or anything but in my experience with FAMS is that they usually sit at or near the rear so they can see the cabin. Haven't seen one in a long time though, come to think of it the last time a FAM introduced himself to the crew I was still a capt which was more than 8 months ago. Guess they gave up on us.
 
You know what they call the 3000 furloughed TSA nazis?

A good start :)

Fly safe - dont forget the servicemen!
 
The FAM's dont have to announce themselves anymore. We had a OPS bulletin about that. You will not get a firearm form or anything from them. One of the Captains I flew with a week ago had one that was a real dick to him when the captain saw the gun under his jacket and asked for his ID. Finally told the guy to show ID or he was calling the sherriff.
 
Glad to see the "airport nazis" will be sharing the joys of our industry.

I guess it now TTSA- Three Thousand less Standing Around
 
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH breath........................AAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


Well Im sure most of them already know where the welfare office is. As Far as FAM I thought they still had to be in front to watch the cockpit door. These idiots!! They get what 3 days of training and the TSA wants how many background checks for pilots? I've said it before. We need about a 5 day national pilot strike to tell the TSA and the government is to stick it up their A$$.
 
I hate to see anyone out of a job (even members the TSA armada), but I think they're finally realizing what's happening: Their organization has scared our customers away. Less business for us means less business for them. By driving us out of business, they're only driving themselves out of a job.

Maybe this will force them to rethink their "shotgun approach" to security, and actually focus it where it's needed. (Hey, a man can dream.) They needed a staff of 9, *plus* a Huntleigh contractor to check IDs, to screen our 7 passengers over the course of an hour the other day. Just amazing.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top