Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

To the Pinnacle FO who wears no belt, and sags his uniform pants....

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
BS. You know good and well that a minority of working pilots actually visit this circus. The only thing you're trying to do is post something with which most people would agree so you can feel better about yourself.

Sorry to shiit in your soup, but i dont need the internet to feel good about myself unlike you and a select few loser cronies on this board.

Im just sick of seeing blatant disrespect of professionalism. Some stuff is acceptable, but i just couldnt let this slide. I could really care less if this doesnt sit well with you, go paint your toenails or post in another thread.
 
Wow.. this entire thread is a perfect commentary of where the airlines are headed...

Down the tubes boys, down the tubes...
 
Save your breath. I see these guys at the majors too. Saw a 57 CA with black velcro tennis shoes with white socks. Some just don't get it.

You're correct sir, some just don't get it.

I don't see as many of the pilots strolling through the terminals as some of you. However, the biggest offenders are the guys in the regional ranks. It is even more funny to see an older mainline guy looking like a goof.
 
Viva la Socialism.......Way to go Obama
What were you Ass-holes thinking?????

This country starting receding in december 2007....Bush was still in office then. This is damage control right now, way to go bush!!! He was the biggest bumbling idiot to ever hold office. The man could barely finish a sentence, that combined with Cheney & Rumsfeld made the Bush Administration a triple threat of domestic destruction.

The war in Iraq has cost us $660 billion dollars as of this month and it keeps climbing....if this country still had that money, we would not be in such dire straits.

BTW take that weak argument elsewhere.
 
Go do a little history hunting, boys. Over half of this nation's Presidents were screw ups. Those with a good head on their shoulders go after the real positions of power, and most of those are unelected or appointed positions. Bush, Obama... neither of them can write a comprehensive bill by themselves. There are many mouths whispering in their ears, and none of us voted for the voices.

Clinton was the last intelligent President.
Reagan was the last President of the people.

And how far back do we have to go to get a military leader as Commander in Chief....
 
Go do a little history hunting, boys. Over half of this nation's Presidents were screw ups. Those with a good head on their shoulders go after the real positions of power, and most of those are unelected or appointed positions. Bush, Obama... neither of them can write a comprehensive bill by themselves. There are many mouths whispering in their ears, and none of us voted for the voices.

Clinton was the last intelligent President.
Reagan was the last President of the people.

And how far back do we have to go to get a military leader as Commander in Chief....

Politics carry way to much opinion had we could disagree all day and night about who speaks better (prepared or not), better ideas or who the people like and don't like.

But we should define leader?
If you are asking who served well you can say W, Bush senior, Reagan, Carter and Ford (who was the fourth consecutive President to have served in the US Navy). Prior to that we had Eisenhower and Truman who both served.
So since Truman we have had only two Presidents who did not serve in the military in any fashion.

Now who was a leader in the military and who was not? Who was a leader as president and who was not?

I can tell you that most service members DIDN'T like Clinton and now it's BHO they don't like. Reagan was loved and Carter was not. Bush senior was liked a great deal. The jury is still out with W, but the majority did like W.
 
anybody that votes Democratic is stupid and hates money
 
Politics carry way to much opinion had we could disagree all day and night about who speaks better (prepared or not), better ideas or who the people like and don't like.

But we should define leader?
If you are asking who served well you can say W, Bush senior, Reagan, Carter and Ford (who was the fourth consecutive President to have served in the US Navy). Prior to that we had Eisenhower and Truman who both served.
So since Truman we have had only two Presidents who did not serve in the military in any fashion.

Now who was a leader in the military and who was not? Who was a leader as president and who was not?
I can tell you that most service members DIDN'T like Clinton and now it's BHO they don't like. Reagan was loved and Carter was not. Bush senior was liked a great deal. The jury is still out with W, but the majority did like W.

Don't forget JFK.
 
Sorry to shiit in your soup, but i dont need the internet to feel good about myself unlike you and a select few loser cronies on this board.

Just follow the advice in your avatar.....you REALLY should.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top