FlyDeltasJets
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2001
- Posts
- 664
RJ,
I just wrote a long post answering your questions, but my stupid computer kicked me off before I could post it. Now I'm pissed!
This one will be shorter because I don't want to get kicked off again.
#1. I have never heard a single comasa MEC member ever state the need to integrate the CMR and ASA lists, but not Delta's. If they took the trouble to work out what their combined lists would look like, why not include ours? All they would have to do would be add ours to the top. Or are they hoping for more than that? We need to know before we proceed.
#2. Regardless of the motivation behind them, the monetary damages sought are obscene, unwarranted, and destroy the rjdc's claim that they are simply fighting for fair representation.
#3. I never claimed that anyone was entitled to more representation based on the amount of dues paid. I simply refuted surplus' claim that the only reason the majors paid more dues it the fact that there are more of us.
#4. I believe that you have fallen for one of the rjdc's lies. I fully recognize the need for rjs, and their value in the marketplace. I am glad that Delta has them. The fact is, Delta can operate as many of them as they want, and I hope that they do. Our only requirement is that they operate them in accordance with the contract that they signed. Once DCI hits a block hour percantage limit, the additional rjs must be flown by Delta pilots. We would negotiate a payrate for them, and if we could not agree on a rate, a system board would meet and impose one, based on certain parameters. That is in our contract, and we would comply with it. Why are we considered such villians when we ask Delta to do the same. All we want is what we have negotiated and agreed to.
I just wrote a long post answering your questions, but my stupid computer kicked me off before I could post it. Now I'm pissed!
This one will be shorter because I don't want to get kicked off again.
#1. I have never heard a single comasa MEC member ever state the need to integrate the CMR and ASA lists, but not Delta's. If they took the trouble to work out what their combined lists would look like, why not include ours? All they would have to do would be add ours to the top. Or are they hoping for more than that? We need to know before we proceed.
#2. Regardless of the motivation behind them, the monetary damages sought are obscene, unwarranted, and destroy the rjdc's claim that they are simply fighting for fair representation.
#3. I never claimed that anyone was entitled to more representation based on the amount of dues paid. I simply refuted surplus' claim that the only reason the majors paid more dues it the fact that there are more of us.
#4. I believe that you have fallen for one of the rjdc's lies. I fully recognize the need for rjs, and their value in the marketplace. I am glad that Delta has them. The fact is, Delta can operate as many of them as they want, and I hope that they do. Our only requirement is that they operate them in accordance with the contract that they signed. Once DCI hits a block hour percantage limit, the additional rjs must be flown by Delta pilots. We would negotiate a payrate for them, and if we could not agree on a rate, a system board would meet and impose one, based on certain parameters. That is in our contract, and we would comply with it. Why are we considered such villians when we ask Delta to do the same. All we want is what we have negotiated and agreed to.