"Safety of flight" had NOTHING to do with the rule being instituted. The rule was instituted for economic reasons. "Safety" was the convenient reason argued AFTER the rule was instituted. PERSONAL economics is the egocentric argument of those who are now infuriated because the rule has been changed. Things change. If that comes as a surprise to you, get in touch with reality. Bitch and moan all you'd like. See if that does you any good. Plan for the future. Expect things to change including your expectations. Plan for the worst and hope for the best. Good luck to ya if you're planning on all your dreams to come true.
Funny though how before all of this safety WAS the pulpit that ALPA stood on when ALPA was against Age 60. The only difference now is that in order for ALPA to turn pro-Age 65, it had to turn it into a pro-economic issues. I posted an article somewhere on the board here referring to directly what I am talking about. Do a search, I am sure you will find it.
By the way, I am quite in touch with reality and I do plan for the future. The only bitching and moaning I do is to myself when I don't try as hard I can to accomplish what I set out to do. With that philosophy (and a lot of free time on overnights), I've managed to earn two advanced degrees, a rising IRA, and some nice non-equity investments -- and I don't plan on flying to be my only career. So yeah, I think all of my dreams will come true