Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

The history of "Scabs"

  • Thread starter Thread starter jarhead
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 5

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
:eek: WTF? First of all, I am NOT a product of Gulfstream, thank you very much. And yes, I am in fact quite familiar with the Railway Labor Act of 1916. As for my relative youth, I am honest enough to present what I am and what I am not to the whole forum, whereas you hide behind a veil. There are 737 captains who don't have a clue about economics and labor relations, and there are Twin Otter pilots in Alaska who could write a book on the very same issues. I've had an intimate view of the industry for my entire life, and have personally witnessed what happens when a picket line is crossed and the longer term consequences of such an action. I have resolved never to succumb to weakness in that manner, and to endeavor to prevent others from making the same mistake.

Every US Major, and darn near every National and Regional have unionized pilot groups. Our frined DGdaPilot appears to be in the aspiring aviator ranks. He also specifically stated that he"[doesn't] like unions" and that he would "never join one." Based on these facts, I concluded that perhaps the airline industry was not for him, and so advised him. Please point out the error in my logic. Perhaps I was not as sensitive as you would have liked?
You should be studying for an upgrade and worrying about whether the person to your left needs anything rather than pretending you are some high fluting savvy industry "veteran'.
I should be studying for upgrade you're right. Am I to presume that you are a high falutin' savvy industry veteran? Because from you I did not find any insightful points, helpful facts, or original commentary on the issue at hand. In another thread you said you were a Republican. That's good, I also lean far to the fiscal and social right. Organized labor is the only philosophical exception to my conservatism. For some reason the AFL-CIO latched on to the Democrats and won't let go, but that's an issue for another day. Anyway, don't rain on my parade unless you have something better to say. Are you one of those IAH hicks who just figured out how to use a computer?
 
Last edited:
haha....I knew I'd get some answer like that. Anyways, if I'm in the airlines, it won't be for long. Corporate is my thing.



P.S. If any one here would have had the experiences with a union that I have, I'm sure you'd understand my viewpoint.
 
Les Paul said:
Go ahead and call me a scab lover or whatever. I haven't done anything wrong. I'm a member of ALPA. There are few if any pilot I know whose aviation career even comes close to mine.


HAHAHA..........For all you old timers to this board lets go back in time for a bit. Remember that guy/kid/idiot that claimed he flew the Concord. He stated he was the FO and he had all these stories about the Concord. Then it finally comes out he was flying Microsoft Flight Simulator across the big pond we call the Atlantic Ocean.

Now Paul, please quit trying to play airline pilot and being a scab lover. I know Microsoft makes a very real flight simulator, but that is only part of the job of being an airline pilot. (if Microsoft could put a picket line that you could cross into their simulator that would be something.)

This issue is dear to the hearts for many of us. If you could only walk in my shoes for the past two years you too would have a distinct flavor in your mouth at the thought of scabs.
 
Just to be clear, Jack London most likely did not write that poem. He did make a speech titled "The Scab" that was later transcribed into a work called "The War of the Classes". But as you'll see here , it does not contain this poem.

The poem was most likely created by a steel union in the mid '20s and falsely attributed to London after his death.
 
"a scab is a traitor to his God, his country, his family and his class"

What an amazing distortion of reality. Why would God care much about someone who crossed a picket line? Is it some sort of horrible sin? By going out on strike, a union is saying that they want improvements before they return to work. In other words, they don't want the job as it currently is. Someone who crosses a picket line is saying that they do want the job as it currently is. Morally speaking, what is wrong with that? I don't see anything wrong with it and I doubt God does either.

And a traitor to his country? You've got to be kidding me. When someone crosses a picket line, he is aiding and abetting management which would make him a traitor to the union, not his country. America is free country. A union has the right to strike and management has the right to replace workers who refuse to work. It's the American way.

I'd be willing to bet that a family only cares if there is food on the table and a little money in the bank. It isn't illegal to cross a picket line so a doubt a family would care much. Of course maybe they will end up the target of the union as it illegally terrorizes them and that is the point of the poem. A union is no better than Osama Bin Laden when it does that. Now who's betraying God?

The way I see it, a person who crosses a picket line is only betraying the union that is on strike. I don't see why he owes the union anything. In return, the union has the right to blacklist him (or whatever you call it) to see that he never works in the industry again. I doubt it stops there though. A union is all about forcing solidarity. As long as you tow the party line, you are okay but as soon as you exercise your own judgement contrary to the union's wishes, you deal with dire consequences. What could be more un-American? Tell me who it is that is really betraying their country?

And about betraying their class... Liberal ideology is all about separation of the classes. The elite want to stay elite and they want those they view as beneath them to stay there. Face it, generally speaking, major airline pilots view regional airline pilots as beneath them. Regional airline pilots view corporate and charter pilots as beneth them. Corporate and charter pilots view CFI's as beneath them. Those in a higher class do not want to move down a class but those in the lower class want to move up. So a pilot that crosses a picket line is not betraying his class, he is betraying the class above him. And the good part is that eventually, he'll probably end up fitting in with that class after that betrayal. This is liberalism at its finest. Why do you think the major unions always endorse Democrats? It's because Democrats are liberal thinkers who want to separate the classes. That's exactly what the unions want. Did I mention the part about who is really betraying their country?
 
Last edited:
JHook makes a good point. Most of what he said was covered in my "Labor Relations" class in college 10 years ago - or was it 15...?

I have a few questions:

Quote by Cardinal
---------------------------------
Or join the corporate ranks and drive down the salaries where so many arrogant anti-unionists call home....
---------------------------------

Don't unions represent the pilots that are making "near minimum wage and no retirement" at the regionals? I am fat and happy at my corporate job - NO union representation by the way. I have also interviewed this month for jobs paying $15,000 more than I'm making now.

The thing that keeps low paying pilot jobs an issue is the fact that pilots are willing to work "for food" just to "build time", etc. The pilots are as much to blame, if not more, than management. To me a SCAB is someone that is willing to cheapen this profession by accepting low salaries or PFT when we should be demanding higher salaries. And didn't a lot of the higher-paying airline pilots began at the minimum wage level? :D

Quote by Cardinal
---------------------------------
Do us all a favor and just keep instructing in your piston driven sardine can for $14/hour...forever. Or join the corporate ranks and drive down the salaries...
---------------------------------

The corporate ranks pay less than $14/hr? Darn, don't tell my boss. He still thinks I should get $XX,000/yr! Just asking...

Inquiring minds wanna know...:)
 
Last edited:
as soon as you exercise your own judgement contrary to the union's wishes, you deal with dire consequences

Never been to an LEC meeting, have you.... The LAST thing a union gets is lockstep obedience (though it sure would help sometimes....)

OK, boys, I usually don't jump into these labor threads, but here goes: I got a postgrad degree a few years back (a JD but don't shoot me) and here is what the good pro-business professors taught me:

!. The basis of all employee/employer relations in this country is contractual; and

2. a valid contract requires equal "standing," i.e. cannot be between parties of vastly different powers.

Now, if all the pilots in an airline go in together to negotiate for a contract, they come close to equal standing, i.e. they can walk out and shut the company down, and management can lock them out and shut the company down. Thus the product of the negotiations is a valid contract.

(And don't brag if you're working without a contract - I did that at my last employer, and it got real degrading right after 9/11. They came through and shredded the "employee handbook" as soon as we had a bad quarter.)

So... all you good free-market Republicans out there - you DO believe in valid contracts, don't you? Only a bad businessman wouldn't....
 
Toy Soldier said:
I am fat and happy at my corporate job - NO union representation by the way.
I beleive I used the term "arrogant anti-unionists" in my previous post. Thank you for making my point.
Toy Soldier said:
To me a SCAB is someone that is willing to cheapen this profession by accepting low salaries or PFT when we should be demanding higher salaries. And didn't a lot of the higher-paying airline pilots began at the minimum wage level? :D
No, a scab is not somebody who accepts a lower salary. You've broadened that definition. A scab is one who crosses a picket line - wasn't that the topic of this thread?
Toy Soldier said:
The corporate ranks pay less than $14/hr? Darn, don't tell my boss. He still thinks I should get $XX,000/yr!
Read my bloody post! I said instructing at $14/hour! And anyway my point was that the airlines clearly were not for DGA, and he agreed with me. Anyway, only Gulfstream and recently Colgan have run pay-for-training operations of any scale lately. Yet the employment papers and websites are chock full of adds where you can buy a type rating to warm the right seat of a corporate/135 aircraft for a pittance per year. This was the point I was making, you corporate guys hoot and holler about your "worth" when your "worth" is just as artificial as airline salaries. Your "worth" is also under threat, can't you see that?

We can all go out and "demand higher salaries" as you put it. We can scream at the top of our lungs as with one voice. But it won't accomplish jack $hit. You cannot rely on the lone individual standing up for principles to jack up wage rates for a job that everybody wants. You have to use sticks and carrots. That requires a union and a union requires some influence/power to function, thus the castigation of scabs.

These are the most basic free market principles at work. Do you actually want an utterly free labor market to work on your employers behalf? You'll get to compete with Bob down the street for your job, and also Jose from Santiago, who's willing to work for $10/day and will send most of it back to his 19 children.

Ya know what, Soldier, looking back at your post, it doesn't really make any coherent point, so I'm just flailing at windmills here. I'll stop now.
 
Last edited:
Cardinal,

You are fighting for that great Quality of Life as a B1900 F/O with 1500hrs?

You are busting a guys balls who makes 14/hr?. What do you make?? 16/hr?? Theres some serious "Union Protection" for ya huh?...Think about it you tool....and I bet they even charge you dues for that fine representation. Go ahead, plaster them stickers all over and show your pride.

And hey, before you generalize the "corporate pukes"....many of us have WAY better job protection, Quality of life, and Pay then you will EVER see!..

You go ahead and be all "union Proud" as you drive home to mom's basement.....Not Everyone WANTS Union "Protection"

Yes a SCAB is a SCUMBAG === but a * moron is just as bad.......
(Edited by Eagleflip for language...stop it!)

:( :(
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, this makes it official, I have never been flamed worse on the internet than on this thread. Thank you all, the a$$ reaming has been refreshing.

Yet again no regard is given to the context of certain phrases. I suggested that he instruct for the rest of his life at such meager pay, because that way he wouldn't have to worry about that union stuff. Do I make much more than that? No. I am poor, I'll sing that from the rooftops. I'm poor, I'm poor! I am a dirt poor Teamster! Happy now? G200, you make more than me. Well you darned well oughtta, you have four times my experience and are the PIC of an aircraft that probably weighs three times more than mine. Yet there is a clear means of advancement in pay on the airline side, structured by a network of union contracts.

We've had, what, 3 US passenger airlines fail in the past 3 years. How many flight departments have closed their doors? How many aircraft were replaced by the fractionals? All I'm saying is that corporate life is not without threat. Can you not admit that? <--- Please respond to this.

There's no meaningful debate here, just flames about my total time. Ya know, when I first referred to the "arrogant anti-unionists" I was half kidding. Now I'm beginning to wonder, cause that shoe surely fits these last posts.
 
Les, after drawing some inferences, I estimate that you make in the neighborhood of $180,000/year as a senior 737 or junior 757 captain. Am I wildly off? So tell me, to what exactly do you ascribe that salary? Do you really think that you are "worth it"? Do you really think that programming an FMS and making a decision from time to time is so rare a skillset that your airline couldn't find hundreds that would do it for less? Do you really think that there is anything between you and the food stamp line other than the organized labor thuggery that brought you that contract? Because that union inflicted unpleasantness is what it takes.
 
well, I hope nobody labels me a "scab"..??

I certainly would never cross a picket line to fly an airplane while guys are sticking thier necks out to make a better life..I dont like flying THAT much....but then again I never wanted to join a Union either! - hence never the desire to work for an airline...

I guess each way has it's pluses and minuses..

To each his own.

Corporate life without threats of job loss? Of course not. I am one of the fortunate to have a severance guarantee, stock options, etc...but I admit this is rare and I am truly lucky. However, I would feel MUCH more comfy in any corp or frac gig right now than any airline...Its nice to see they MAY be coming back to life - Lord knows I would love to see my airline friends back at work....but, as many of them have told me, all its gonna take is another 9/11 and WHAM, back in the toilet for years...as a matter of fact, I know 2 who went fractional and WONT go back because of the stability problem. Now, we are in the WRONG business is we are looking for stability...but I will take the corp side myself...

And Cardinal, I certainly wasn't trying to compare paychecks and experience with you....but since you brought it up.....when I had your time I flew a King Air 200 and made 48K/yr.....now thats about...ummm...HALF the size of the mighty 1900....so with your size logic I should have made...ummm..HALF the bucks you make...You pulling down 96K this year?

:D :D
 
Last edited:
Thank you for the civil response. Now hand over the fax number of that King Air operator and no one will get hurt...Seriously, these days people aren't exactly rioting in the streets over the lack of pilots, King Air PIC at 1500 hours is a significant accomplishment.
 
I like scabs, they taste good.
 
A few comment from someone who lived through and walked during a nasty (and completely unsuccessful) ALPA strike.

Aside from the thread drift, the term scab as it applied to strikebreakers was coined in the 1800's when the railroads went on strike. The RR companies imported thousands of Asians who, during the ocean crossings had deficient diets (fruits and vegetables) that created skin lesions. The term was used by the striking RR workers seeing the condition of the people as they showed up for work.

A couple of other comments. Could someone answer the question why so many scabs on the "list" are ex ALPA members? Does that not concern anyone? It sure concerns me.

To the person who wrote about the CAL pilots suing ALPA, remember there have been many ALPA members in good standing that have sued ALPA for millions. It happened at UAL, it has happened at CAL with the O'Neil group. They were brother striking pilots BTW. It is occurring now with the RJDC.

It is comical to see the chest thumping and rhetoric from some neophytes here on the forum. I can guarantee you that no one can predict who will cross a picket line. I can vividly remember some real hard nose pilots that blew through the picket line in a heartbeat. And some others that stayed out for the duration that shocked me.

FSB99

I can assure you sir that the CAL scabs could care less they are not "forgiven". Many crossed due to a real axe to grind with ALPA in the first place. Your ideals are so far from meaning anything to these people it is funny. However, what you do accomplish in your thinking does nothing to promote the unity that is required to attain a decent industry contract. I have flown with numerous examples of non scab CAL pilots who concern me more than the strikebreakers.

As far as Jack London. If anyone reads the history of this guy and espouses his writings they are a fool. London was a devote socialist.

P.S. I spent 25 months on a picket line so before some moron decides to cast labels on my thinking, reread the first line carefully.
 
Last edited:
Boeingman:

Thank you for the attempt at getting this thread back on the rails, but if you had started from the beginning of the thread, you'd see that first use of the term "scab" to define a strikebreaker predates the construction of the first railroad by about 25 years.

So your explanation of the origin of the word is not only quite a stretch, but impossible.

As for Jack London, you're right. He was a socialist. Therefore he was pro-labor. Therefore he gets the attribution for a poem about scabs written years after his death.
 
Hoo Boy

Cardinal said:
..."Or join the corporate ranks and drive down the salaries where so many arrogant anti-unionists call home."...

This has to be the funniest, most ill-informed statement I've seen in months.

The superior pay and benefit packages in the corporate world among Fortune 100 flight departments was achieved over the decades by demonstrating the value and worth of what they offer to the company, and negotiating accordingly with an eye to what the coporate "industry standard" has been. Salaries have almost never failed to rise, and applicants who offer to "do it for less" in the naive hope that it will elevate their chances are quickly shown the door by the Department Manager. For one thing, it shows that the applicant doesn't know jack about the world of corporate flying, hasn't bothered to find out what type of wages are standard, or the relationship between a company's management and it's pilots.

And there's more than a little irony in your statement given recent history, you being a die-hard, airline unionist and all (although it probably pre-dates your experience so you wouldn't remember). I'll provide some: Beginning about 10 years ago the fractionals began expanding rapidly, hiring gobs of pilots to fly corporate-type aircraft in a quasi-corporate operation. In many ways, competing with established corporate flight departments.

In large part, these newbie fractional pilots were drawn from the regional airline pilot ranks (ALPA members or wannabes), hundreds of them..pilots in search of stepping-stone jet time to make themselves competitive in their race for a mainline job, since back then the regionals were operating only turboprops like Brasilias, Jetstreams, and of course the venerable Beech 1900.

In their breathtaking ignorance, these "union-boys" accepted these jobs flying the exact same equipment on the same type of missions as their bona-fide corporate counterparts, but for about HALF THE PAY as what the corporate world industry standard was. And for the "privelege" of making these ridiculously sub-standard wages, they PFT-ed (and still sign training contracts) for their SIC check-outs...something unheard of in the corporate world for anything but a shoestring, laughingstock operation.

But by far the funniest thing was hearing them yakking in FBO lounges, about how GREAT it was while trying to recruit coporate pilots to join their ranks (I always wondered if they got a free set of steak knives or something if they succeeded). In their minds, the big "cherry-on-top" was the fact they were...(drum roll/roll eyes)...UNIONIZED!

("So let me get this straight. I can go to work for HALF the salary I make now, pay 10K for an SIC check-out on an aircraft I'm already typed in, and best of all, chip in another percentage for union dues for those that set up this stellar deal? Gee, where do I sign up, Sparky?"). Ya just wanted to pat the them on their head and send them on their way.

Such was, and continues to be, the record of unionized pilots in the corporate arena. To me, it sounds exactly what a SCAB is accused of in the airline world, doesn't it?

The basic truth is this, Cardinal; the poster who you directed your salvo at hasn't the experience (yet) to be competetive for being hired in the Fortune 100 corporate world, and judging by your profile, neither do you. In these unfortunate days however, plenty of out-of-work, former ALPA etc., airline pilots do (in terms of hours). Sadly and ironically, either through sheer ignorance or because they think none of their "bretheren" are looking, many of them now are out there right now in the non-unionized corporate world advertising they will "do it for less". Don't think it's true of your brothers? think again. When I did the hiring at a corporate flight department I saw plenty of them, and those applications that offered to "do it for less" than the industry standard for the type of aircraft we flew were the first one's in the trash can. Frankly, the record of airline pilots negotiating their own wages in the corporate world sucks.

It might be wise to clean up your own house on the issue before making broad-brush statements about a group being "arrogant", given that you've never even been inside their house in the first place. I've been inside yours, however, and it ain't all that tidy on the arrogance front.
 
Cardinal to G200 said:
"I'm poor, I'm poor! I am a dirt poor Teamster! Happy now?"

Not suprising, the same org that represents the largest group of under-compensated frac pilots. Tell me again why union representation is such a be-all/end-all?

"Yet there is a clear means of advancement in pay on the airline side, structured by a network of union contracts."

And at any Fortune 100 flight department, the same clear advancement in pay exists, structured by larger company policy for it's employees. You see, annual raises based on percentage of salary are practically assumed, but represent just a small part of the package that allows any good company retain it's valued personnel. To believe that a union must negotiate such run-of-the-mill policies is a myth perpetuated by those who tell themselves theirs is the only way, because they assume theirs is the only World...one where management and pilots are at each other's throats and looking to screw one another.

A simple truth is this; the act of knowingly ACCEPTING a job for sub-standard wages (that includes union-negotiated ones) in that US vs. Them environment is a loud-and-clear vote for management to see what you think your skills are worth as a professional. Subsequent to sending this self-defeating message, going on to "fight the fight" to achieve mere liveable wages and conditions is nothing more than trying to make-up a never-made bed you agreed to sleep in. To "win" in that environment is more paying a penance for your own mistake than achieving a victory.

Now, if you want to believe the unionist line that the union-negotiated-and-agree-to, cow-pie compensation airline management flopped out (remember, you eagerly accepted it with both hands when you succeeded in entering the regionals' pasture) will quit stinking to high heaven because they'll fight to poke a few daisies in it, that's your affair. But please don't try to convince the rest of us that waving a union card and spouting union rhetoric equates to possessing magic wand and spellbook that can transform the daisy-adorned dung into a friggin' bouquet of flowers.

"There's no meaningful debate here, just flames about my total time. Ya know, when I first referred to the "arrogant anti-unionists" I was half kidding. Now I'm beginning to wonder, cause that shoe surely fits these last posts.
"

Spare us the persecution complex. If you publicly label a person or group "arrogant" (a detrimental term) simply because they don't share your view, then expect a response. From what I see, however, you have no interest in "meaningful debate". "Debate", you see, implies that persuation is possible through the use of logic, but it's clear your union has you programmed.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top