Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

The Hidden Costs of Taxes to the Airline Industry

  • Thread starter Thread starter chase
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 2

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

chase

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 27, 2001
Posts
1,217
For those wishing to get into this business and interviewing realize the hurdles for companies to make money is difficult. There is great inefficiency out there within the ATC and airport operations, TSA included (government runned services...who'd thunk that:rolleyes: ) and this adds a burden to any airline company & to the customer that is an untold story in light of all the struggles of airlines. It isn't the primary cause mind you but certainly contributes...this articles points out some of those problems clearly I believe.

_____________

Are U.S. Airlines Overtaxed?
By R2A Management Consulting



No other U.S. industry is compelled to depend so extensively on government-controlled, user-provided infrastructure funds (airports and airways), and no other U.S. industry has its minute-by-minute operating efficiency capped by the daily operating efficiency of the federal government (air traffic control). Consequently, since air transportation is an essential element of the U.S. economy, it is imperative that government’s core role and responsibilities do not impede the efficiency of this vital sector. As the National Commission to Ensure a Strong Competitive Airline Industry (Baliles Commission) put it in its 1993 report to the president and Congress:



The air transportation system has become essential to the economic progress for the citizens and businesses of this nation.Without it, our country will be hamstrung in its ability to participate in an increasingly global community and marketplace. Air transportation makes possible the quick movement of millions of people and billions of dollars worth of goods to markets around the world. We need to be able to compete in those markets, and there is often no practical alternative to air transportation. Similarly, the growth of a competitive domestic economy depends more and more on our ability to move by air.



In 2004, the major U.S. scheduled airlines lost $9.2 billion on system revenues of $92.9 billion, a negative margin of 10%. Prospects for financial improvement in 2005 range from poor to non-existent.



Yet, taxes and fees levied on charged the industry and its customers will increase in 2005 and are estimated by the Air Transport Association of America (ATA) to be $15.8 billion. Federally mandated but unfunded security requirements add another $1.3 billion. As dismal as this sounds, it gets worse. These fees and charges are expected to continue to increase, with little industry input and apparently with no end in sight.


In 1972, U.S. airlines had three federal tax categories, an 8% passenger ticket tax, a $3 international departure tax (no international arrival tax), and a 5% cargo waybill tax. This year, the number of tax categories has risen to 15. The passenger ticket tax has dropped only a half a percentage point, to 7.5%, despite the introduction of a new flight segment charge—currently $3.20—and the waybill tax is up 1.25 percentage points to 6.25%. The international departure tax has increased $11.10 per passenger to $14.10, and then doubled by charging international arrivals as well.



In 2001, the PFC cap was raised from $3.00 to $4.50, and there is now a frequent flyer sales tax of 7.5%, a jet fuel tax of 4.3 cents per gallon, and a security fee of $2.50. The airlines also now face user fees on Customs, Immigration, and Animal and Plant Health Inspection services, the last of which was raised unilaterally by the Department of Agriculture in January of this year.


This is a huge increase in taxes and fees paid largely by airline customers at the very time the industry is undergoing painful restructuring. The funding mechanism for aviation infrastructure development and vital industry services is severely damaged and may be irreparably broken. Like the airline industry itself, the system must be radically changed. Since the current tax-and- fee regime is complex, with little or no accountability or transparency for taxes and fees assessed, the answer to the above question of whether the airline industry is overtaxed is—yes, but we suspect the main culprit is significant inefficiency of the existing system. In commenting on the state of the airline industry in 1993, the Baliles Commission stated in its report:


There are obvious signs for concern: airlines are liquidating, merging or filing for bankruptcy protection. Delays and other system inefficiencies are costing the American economy billions of dollars per year. Manufacturers of aerospace products are consolidating and even leaving the business entirely. Jobs in these high-wage high-skilled sectors are being lost by the thousands. Airline debt levels are reaching historic and unsustainable proportions.



Sound familiar?



The Economy Ultimately Pays

Although many of the taxes and fees are paid by the customer and some by the airline, ultimately it is the economy who must pay. Call it what you want, operating costs, taxes, fees, the resulting increased overall price of air transportation drives down market demand that produces less revenue for airlines, lost jobs and personal income, and a slowing in the trade economy. As currently structured, taxes and fees for passenger travel range from around 12% of the base air fare to more than double the base fare.



As a benchmark, the average domestic passenger base fare for the year ended September 30, 2004, was $145.50 one-way or $291.00 round-trip. If the 2005 service provided at this fare is nonstop, the total price to the customer will be $333.23, with taxes and fees amounting to $42.23 or 15% of the base fare. If the 2005 service is in the same market, but with one connection, the total price rises 6% to $353.63, including $62.63 in taxes and fees or 22% of the base fare. If two connections are made traveling in this market (logically more typical of travel to/from the smaller communities), the total price rises to $360.03, including $69.03 in taxes and fees—24% of the base fare.



As air fares are continuing to decline, the relative tax-and-fee burden on airline customers necessarily will rise. The trend of downward average fares has accelerated since 2000 as the availability of low fares has spread domestically. With Delta’s new Simplifares, and the competitive reaction by other network airlines, average fares will trend lower still.

__________________
 
The Hidden Taxpayer Subsidies Given to the Airline Industry

Hi!

While it is true that the airlines are taxes, they are also heaviely subsidized.

Each large jet sold in the world today is subsidized by various government agencies to the tune of 50%. In other words, if NWA pays $40m to Boeing/Airbus for a jet, the actual cost of delivering that jet was $80m, and we, the taxpayers, picked up the other 50%.

The airlines don't pay for ATC, and didn't pay to build the airports. Out of regulation, the legacy carriers were given their current routes, slots and gates. None of the above three were auctioned on the open market when deregulation occured. That is one of the main reasons that deregulation took so long to occur.

Numerous subsidies (via tax breaks, tax credits, etc.)are given to airlines to open or keep a hub, to open or keep a maintenance base, etc. Some cities pay direct subsidies to airlines to fly to their location.

ALL the transportation in the US is heavily subsidized by the taxpayers: Air, water shipping, trucking, auto travel, trains, public transportation, etc.

We can argue the degree of fairness of how the subsidies are allocated, but all of our travel is government subsidized.

Cliff
YIP
 
Out of regulation, the legacy carriers were given their current routes, slots and gates. None of the above three were auctioned on the open market when deregulation occured.

Huh ?

The route, slot, gate landscape has changed dramatically since deregulation. The routes, slots, & gates the legacies have now don't look anything like they did before Deregulation. And a lot of it was sold on the open market to the highest bidder. Just a few changes since Deregulation...........

--UAL closed their CLE hub; CAL closed their DEN hub; AMR open hubs in BNA, RDU & SJC, & then scaled them back; DAL left DFW & ORD; USAir dumped their West Coast routes, after buying PSA, as did AMR, after buying Air Cal, then AMR bought Reno Air & are back in the West Coast. AMR bought TWA & got a STL hub, routes & gates.

--Delta expanded by buying Northeast & Western. Northwest bought Republic, which was a combination of Hughes Air West, Southern & North Central. Continental has pieces of People's Express, Texas International, New York Air, Eastern, & Frontier in them. Allegheny changed its name to USAir & bought PSA. Then they bought Piedmont; who had previously bought Empire.

--NWA sold DCA slots to USAir; UAL bought Pan Am's Pacific routes; AMR bought EAL's Latin American routes; DAL bought Pan Am's Atlantic routes; the original Pan Am & Eastern Shuttles have been named Trump, USAir & Delta. CAL sold their LGA terminal, along with the slots, to USAir.
 
Last edited:
Hi!

320AV8R: Yes, the changes you've mentioned have occurred since deregulation has occurred.

What I'm talking about would've increased the pace of deregulation significantly, and many of the changes that have occurred since deregulation, as you have noted, would have occurred immediately.

If, on the date that deregulation occurred, the Gov't would've auctioned off all current routes, gates and slots, then anyone with money could have purchased those assets at that time.

With those assets, they could have continued in their current status (if UAL, for example, would've purchased all the UAL routes, gates and slots), they could have rapidly expanded (if DAL, for example, would've purchased all the DAL routes, gates and slots, along with the AA routes gates and slots), or a new airline could've started up (routes, gates and slots purchased from various airlines).

The government let the airlines keep their routes, gates and slots, which was a huge bonus for the existing airlines, and was a huge barrier to new entrants, continuing even to this day.

Now, I want to make clear that I'm not slamming the airlines, as all modes of travel have experienced huge government subsidies. For example, the railroads were only able to start up because the gov't gave the right-of-way (the land) to the railroads in exchange for building track on the land.

They actually gave the railroads more land than they needed, and the railroads made a fortune from selling land along the track to private citizens and companies.

We are in the midst of the process of deregulation, which does seem hard to understand when you think of how long ago deregulation started. I am stating one of the main reasons that deregulation has taken so long to occur.

Cliff
YIP
 
What I'm talking about would've increased the pace of deregulation significantly, and many of the changes that have occurred since deregulation, as you have noted, would have occurred immediately.

Things did occur immediately, starting the day the industry was deregulated. Braniff expanded very rapidly, particuarly into Asia. They thought Deregulation was going to be a failed experiment & wanted to grab as much territory as they could very quickly. The result was their over expansion & later demise.

If, on the date that deregulation occurred, the Gov't would've auctioned off all current routes, gates and slots, then anyone with money could have purchased those assets at that time.

Why auction anything ? The day after Deregulation, any airline could fly anywhere, anytime, except for a few slot-contoled airports.

The government let the airlines keep their routes, gates and slots, which was a huge bonus for the existing airlines, and was a huge barrier to new entrants, continuing even to this day.

The only thing the Goverment controlled after Deregulation was slots in airports like DCA, LGA, etc... There were no other route restrictions. The gates were leased from the airport by the airlines. The Port Authority had no problem renovating an abandoned terminal & providing plenty of gates at EWR for People's Express during it's expansion. DAL bought the Pan Am Shuttle, and the slots with it. Donald Trump bought the Eastern Shuttle & its slots. NWA sold some DCA slots to USAir.

It was a free-for-all. New entrants having a barrier ? Anyone could start an airline anywhere they wished. There have been HUNDREDS of airlines started after Deregulation. Do Air Florida, New York Air, Jet America, Muse Air, Transtar, Pacific Express, Northeastern, Hawaii Expresss, Air1, Air Atlanta, Sunworld, MarkAir, Cascade, Key Air, Pride Air, Presidential, or MGM Grand Air ring a bell ? How about AirTran & Jetblue ? They started after Deregulation, have expanded, & are here today despite all the routes, gates & slots of the "established" carriers.
 
Hi!

It sounds like it was more open that I thought.

I thought, however, that the routes were controlled. I read about airlines asking the US gov't for permission for new routes.

I do believe that ALL the US->foreign destinations WERE controlled, and that they were not auctioned off-the airlines that had those routes pre-deregulation kept flying them. Is that correct?

Cliff
YIP

PS-Thanx 4 the info!
 
I do believe that ALL the US->foreign destinations WERE controlled, and that they were not auctioned off-the airlines that had those routes pre-deregulation kept flying them. Is that correct?

A lot of International routes are still Gov't controlled. Places like NRT or LHR.......very tightly controlled. It depends on the Bi-Lateral Aviation agreement in place. The US and UK have been fighting this one for years. Other countries have an Open Skies policy....like the US and Canada, and we just signed one with India. You can fly almost unrestricted between these two countries and the US.
 
What the?

atpcliff said:
Hi!


Each large jet sold in the world today is subsidized by various government agencies to the tune of 50%. In other words, if NWA pays $40m to Boeing/Airbus for a jet, the actual cost of delivering that jet was $80m, and we, the taxpayers, picked up the other 50%.

Your joking, right? Who pays Boeing the other 50%? I think you have Boeing and Airbus confused partner...:rolleyes:

The airlines don't pay for ATC, and didn't pay to build the airports.

Your partly correct, but what came first, Chicken or the egg? The airlines brought the cash to pay for these very systems you say are free to them...
 

Latest resources

Back
Top