Bubba: These are the same thing really (the WA or the case SWA made to stay at DAL). Either both are equally right, or both are equally wrong.
You had the right to win a court case to stay ant DAL (in order to stay in business). And Jim Wright and the MANY other parties had a right to amend the Constitution. They were trying to adhere to the original Federal mandate that required DFW. SWA wanted to preserve the right to EXPLOIT everyone else.
What you, and every SWA poster on here or every one I know personally, cannot do is put themselves in another's shoes. You have to understand that whatever you think about someone else's situation, what they feel/believe is real to them. Whether it's an argument about Love Field/Hobby or what 911 did, the unchecked self righteous arrogance that apparently is a learned behavior at SWA disgusts me.
Say whatever you want, write 10,000 words, I don't care. The first 3 sentences of this post are spot on.
You had the right to win a court case to stay ant DAL (in order to stay in business). And Jim Wright and the MANY other parties had a right to amend the Constitution. They were trying to adhere to the original Federal mandate that required DFW. SWA wanted to preserve the right to EXPLOIT everyone else.
What you, and every SWA poster on here or every one I know personally, cannot do is put themselves in another's shoes. You have to understand that whatever you think about someone else's situation, what they feel/believe is real to them. Whether it's an argument about Love Field/Hobby or what 911 did, the unchecked self righteous arrogance that apparently is a learned behavior at SWA disgusts me.
Say whatever you want, write 10,000 words, I don't care. The first 3 sentences of this post are spot on.