Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Tattooed flight attendants

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Here is a nice suggestion GV, If the cabin attendant is a valuable employee with solid work history on other corporate jets, then perhaps suggest a band-aid over the tattoo and maybe a darker shade of hose. This way it looks more like a cut healing.
 
In the airline world, you can be and ARE asked if you have any tattoos that would be visible while in uniform. At AMR, if the answer is yes, you are not hired. If you agree to have them removed, not just promise to cover them, you are made a contingent offer but must prove they've been removed before you finish new-hire class.

If they are not visible while in uniform, you do not have to say anything to anyone about them.


Personally, I think they look cheap and unclassy.
 
How weird are some of these chicks with a tramp stamp going to look when they are 70 or so, sitting in a nursing home???
 
pgcfii2002 said:
How weird are some of these chicks with a tramp stamp going to look when they are 70 or so, sitting in a nursing home???

wow...that's pretty harsh. my rule of thumb when i got mine was not to get anything that i would be embarrassed to have when i got older. the two that i have are relatively small (2") and both have special meaning. one of them is a heart with wings that i got in memory of my late husband. not all tattooes are tramp stamps. some women that get them may be tramps, but don't lump us all together just because of a tattoo.
 
Dirty Sanchez said:
There is nothing like a good tramp stamp to raise morale.

You listen to Boortz too? That is one of his "trademark" statements.
 
Last edited:
you know MEN get tatoo's too! in the service! women are not tramps because of tatoos! I don't have one, I don't even have my ears pierced for earings.Some of us are good people, by boyfriend is a Harley Hog, does that make him wrong?

some people are " Born to be Wild" Smart people enjoy wild times, don't worry about tatoo's if I have to find it on the internet I will. But most Miliatary guys/gals have a tatoo, it is matter of reflection, the name of your man or girl!

Dont worry about it.
 
Last edited:
I went to the beach the other day with my husband. We saw a beautiful couple with 3 small kids playing around. She was such a beautiful woman and he was so attractive too. They were very attentive to their kids, shelling, body surfing, burying each other in the sand.....but then the parents turned around and both had tatoos all over their backs. Sad to say but we were both shocked and mentioned it to each other. We couldn't believe it. Here is what we said: "I don't get it!" So help me here cuz "I don't get it". What's the reason to do this?
 
skygirl1968 said:
I think this is an age old debate of conservative vs. liberal lifestyles/views. I have a tattoo on each ankle, that I covered with uniform pants when I was on duty as an F/A. I'm not cheap, easy, hick, or dumb, and rather resent the implication...they both have a special and personal meaning to me and they are simply an expression of my personality. Again, its just a matter of personal taste and if its offensive or against company policy to have them visible then simply wear a uniform that covers them up while you're on duty. The airline that I was working for had it stated in thier company policy that if you had tatts, you had to cover them while on duty. Simple.

It's more a sign of the times than anything else. I read a statistic that somewhere around 40% of all under 30 folks have at least one. I'm a conservative, professional, military pilot with one tattoo, so is my brother. My wife has two, including the "tramp stamp," and she's the most beautiful, classiest, intelligent woman I know. I'm actively working on getting my second. To put it into perspective, it's kind of like the stigma men with earrings had back in the 80's and early 90's. Now, you hardly look twice at dudes with earrings. 20 years from now, when 50% or more of 50 year olds have tats, it will be a non-issue.
 
And 20 years from now, 50 year old women with tattoos will look just as dumb as guys with earrings do today.....
 
Whats the big deal here anyways? If you want to get ink then go and do as you please. If you are inclined to apply for a professional position where visible ink is frowned upon, then take that into account. Simple as that!

I fly with many pilots and flight attendants that are inked and rarely is it even a problem as the ink is concealed with uniform parts. It is our preconcieved notions that "ink is evil" that is wrong. the freedom to decorate our bodies should be recognized and not scorned. It is a personal choice and freedom.

Here's a little story... A couple weeks back I was starting a 4 day trip. As usual day one is grueling. Starting with a 4 am alarm, commute across the country, check in at noon, and fly 5 legs (7+ hours) and at the hotel by midnight. My crew this trip was awesome and we all clicked and got along really well and had a very good day one. No socializing that night as we were all beat... I was looking forward to the next 3 days.

the next morning I had breakfast and went to the pool to relax before show time. Out there I found one of my crew members relaxing as well. when they rolled over I then saw the HUGE TATTOO across their entire upper back! It made for a good discussion that morning.

I guess that the moral of the story is that ANYONE could have a HUGE TATTOO that you cant even see while on duty. In this individual's case, they were the utmost professional on and off the job. Their personality and disposition were not altered one bit by the fact that they had ink.

Rant over!!!
 
cargoflyr69 said:
Whats the big deal here anyways? If you want to get ink then go and do as you please...
...It is our preconcieved notions that "ink is evil" that is wrong. the freedom to decorate our bodies should be recognized and not scorned. It is a personal choice and freedom....
...I guess that the moral of the story is that ANYONE could have a HUGE TATTOO that you cant even see while on duty. In this individual's case, they were the utmost professional on and off the job. Their personality and disposition were not altered one bit by the fact that they had ink.

Rant over!!!

HERE HERE!!! I love you!
 
SSDD said:
I'm old school...ink is for ex-cons...there is no such thing as "tasteful"

I see ink and I think scumbag...

You just called a LOT of veterans, soldiers, firefighters, and policemen scumbags.
 
In Japan, there is a style of tattoo that is completely 100% full body EXCEPT the face. Usually there is a Samurai theme, with a lot of historic references to clans and past times. These guys put on a suit and tie, and you see nothing.

Part of the show involved one guy who wanted to do his face. He went ahead and did so, knowing he'd be fired for it. His daily routine calls for a pound of pancake makeup applied all over his face to hide the tattoo. So far his boss doesn't know. Can you imagine what he looks like with that makeup, heavy enough to cover full facial tattooing?

My resistance and repugnance of tattooing is weakening with exposure. Remember 25 years ago, when a single pierced ear in a guy was freaky and meant he was gay? Now it's utterly commonplace.
 
Flyboy Sabre 65 said:
I would have to so to the visible tattoos. All the flight crew should present themselves as professionals. You don't see your CEO or any other high profile company person showing tattoos. Having said all that I have two tattoos and they stay covered up while flying as well.
nuts.jpg


just messing around
 
MissKittyKat said:
you know MEN get tatoo's too! in the service! women are not tramps because of tatoos! I don't have one, I don't even have my ears pierced for earings.Some of us are good people, by boyfriend is a Harley Hog, does that make him wrong?

some people are " Born to be Wild" Smart people enjoy wild times, don't worry about tatoo's if I have to find it on the internet I will. But most Miliatary guys/gals have a tatoo, it is matter of reflection, the name of your man or girl!

Dont worry about it.

This is not directed at MissKittyKat.


"Good People"?

You can't be "good people" with a tatoo? I have one. It's on my ankle.

You must be either Old, Religious, or Anal to talk down to people with TATS!

In fact, you may just be a dorky pilot.

You guy's are the reason this industry went from Pilots being regarded as "cool", to pilots wearing pants hiked up, reebok sneakers, long-sleeved shirts, khaki pants and white sneakers on over-nights, '50's haircuts, braided belts, stone-washed jeans, and having no GAME.

I'm the exact opposite of all of you dorks, and the fact is, you embarrass me!!
 
phishn@daves said:
You must be either Old, Religious, or Anal to talk down to people with TATS!

In fact, you may just be a dorky pilot.

You guy's are the reason this industry went from Pilots being regarded as "cool", to pilots wearing pants hiked up, reebok sneakers, long-sleeved shirts, khaki pants and white sneakers on over-nights, '50's haircuts, braided belts, stone-washed jeans, and having no GAME.

I'm the exact opposite of all of you dorks, and the fact is, you embarrass me!!

Uhh, no, it's not "us" dorky types that wear a clean uniform, pressed shirt, good haircut, and shined shoes that's taking us down... it's the backpacks, ipods, weird baggage, black running shoes, and other accoutrements of so many RJ types you see strolling through the airport.

As for layover clothing, who gives a rat's a$$. If you're in layover clothes, unless you spout foolishly at the bar, which is a noob/dork trait in and of itself, no one should know you're a pilot anyhow.
 
Gorilla said:
Uhh, no, it's not "us" dorky types that wear a clean uniform, pressed shirt, good haircut, and shined shoes that's taking us down... it's the backpacks, ipods, weird baggage, black running shoes, and other accoutrements of so many RJ types you see strolling through the airport.

As for layover clothing, who gives a rat's a$$. If you're in layover clothes, unless you spout foolishly at the bar, which is a noob/dork trait in and of itself, no one should know you're a pilot anyhow.

I wear a clean uniform, always pressed, but if you find that you resemble the above remark, I'm sorry.

truely sorry.

Penny Lane has a shop for you. Beneath the blue suburban skies.:erm:
 
phishn@daves said:
I wear a clean uniform, always pressed, but if you find that you resemble the above remark, I'm sorry.

truely sorry.

Actually my layover gear consists of a swimsuit, flip-flops, and usually some loud caribbean shirt, because that's where I am. Often a locally bought Cuban is at hand. We avoid meat markets and generally kick back on the beach.

Let me get this straight... those of us in our 40's and '50's REALLY need to get with the program. Coupla tats, maybe some piercings, and some cool new clothes. Next, we hit the bars and clubs, loudly making sure everyone knows we're pilots. That way, our 'profession' won't have a dork image. Nice.

Do you think, maybe, that our professional image is based upon what we look like, and how we perform, on duty? What a concept. Do you walk around the airport with an ipod set dangling from your cranium, and a faraway look in your eyes, avoiding interaction with other people? THAT is what makes us look bad. Fess up... you wear an ipod at work.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top