Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWAPA might like SWA proposal

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
when the details are released it would really be helpful for that Q and A thread so some of us can figure out where we fall within the system.
 
Lear 70: Can you explain how the ATL fence works? Obviously not all AT pilots are based in ATL, nor would ATL support all AT pilots (in terms of size). Will the fence protect all AirTran pilots? Will it involve only the 717, not the 737? What happens to AT based in MKE, MCO etc. on the 737? Thanks.

Amazing that SWA pilots are actually trying to glean rumors from AAI folk that may or may not be providing inaccurate rumors, intentionally or unintentionally.
 
Lear 70: Can you explain how the ATL fence works? Obviously not all AT pilots are based in ATL, nor would ATL support all AT pilots (in terms of size). Will the fence protect all AirTran pilots? Will it involve only the 717, not the 737? What happens to AT based in MKE, MCO etc. on the 737? Thanks.
I would, but I don't have *ALL* the facts, such as at what rate the aircraft will be pulled down from ATL, how many they're looking to put through training and in what aircraft and out of what base they'll pull those pilots for training (although I have enough to figure out how it shakes out for where I'll personally sit when the music STOPS in terms of training, assuming no one senior to me bids out of ATL).

However, I will tell you that NO 737 pilot will remain based in MCO or MKE once they "cross the fence" after their training (unless they can hold MCO with their system-wide seniority and there's a vacancy - not many of us).

Because MCO and MKE weren't yet staffed on 9/27, there were no MCO- or MKE-based pilots that were "protected". As such, when each AAI 737 pilot from MCO or MKE goes through training, they will become ATL-based, unless they bid to another SWA domicile that has a vacancy open, according to their combined system seniority (which means they'll go sit reserve somewhere in all likelihood).

If there aren't sufficient positions in ATL, then the most junior ATL pilot gets displaced with displacement rights when someone senior comes out of training.

The 717's in MCO will initially stay, don't know for how long, I wasn't told fleet plans for anything other than ATL's initial base composition (our MC may not know, either). There are no 717's in MKE.
 
Last edited:
It's quiet because it's supposed to be quiet. What's odd about that?

So far, all this board has provided is inaccurate rumors and negative innuendo likely from whisper campaigns, all courtesy of alpa and aai folk.
Who's being negative? As far as accuracy, I guess we'll see in a week or so when the language gets hammered out.

Before we all start the hand shaking and backslapping, I suggest we wait for the real deal to be announced.
I don't know about "the real deal", but I'll still shake the hand of any Southwest pilot I meet, regardless of what happens going forward. Most of you are great people, it's been a pleasure to meet several of you from this forum, and I look forward to meeting more of you in the future. :beer:
 
The AAI guys have the demographics on their side. No matter the fence, in 10 years, they'll own half of the top of the list anyway and the pre-93 SWA guys will all be gone at that point.

Nu
 
The AAI guys have the demographics on their side. No matter the fence, in 10 years, they'll own half of the top of the list anyway and the pre-93 SWA guys will all be gone at that point.

Nu
Our junior CA's got mixed in with your senior F/O's in such a way as to prevent that. That's why there are different ratios all throughout the list, your Negotiating Committee covered their bases with the ratios.

In 10 years I won't have even climbed back to my CURRENT seniority percentage at AirTran. Most of our senior F/O's and junior CA's are in the same boat.
 
Our junior CA's got mixed in with your senior F/O's in such a way as to prevent that. That's why there are different ratios all throughout the list, your Negotiating Committee covered their bases with the ratios.

In 10 years I won't have even climbed back to my CURRENT seniority percentage at AirTran. Most of our senior F/O's and junior CA's are in the same boat.

Brother, in ten years you will not recognize this place. I do mean in a good way.
 
The Swapa site is oddly quiet. Only 1 or 2 threads with zero specifics. I think that's another reason why some on this board are stating where the leaks are coming from.

On another note I wanted to thank you and Lear for your professionalism and continued commitment to the process.

E

Seems like a couple people at atnALPA do not agree with the direction of the MC and leaked bits of information to try and derail the talks. When that did not work they actually stopped the MC from going to DALLAS. All the talk about trusting the MC and recalling those who were medelling in the MC and now this. It all seems very unprofessional to me. Now we can't stop talking about an agreement that is not finished and may never be finished if some get there way. I can only shake my head.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top