Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWAPA might like SWA proposal

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
It is sad the narcissistic posting of partial details when all sides have been asked not to post anything yet, as well as non disclosures.
 
When I've spoken to 1/3 of our MEC officials and they're all saying the same thing? Yeah, I feel pretty comfortable relying on it. Some are saying more than others, some are more positive, some are more negative, but the basic info is the same.

Additionally, a few things I posted above are being posted on our internal forum directly from the MC to counteract some bad info that's being passed around 3rd and 4th hand and getting people really riled up, so yeah, what you see above I think is pretty dang accurate. ;)


I think I already said that it was obviously not the entire picture, just a few snapshots. I'm not trying to aggravate anyone, just passing on some basic info. If no one wants it, I'll stop passing it on. Jeez, talk about shooting the messenger... :rolleyes:


I'm not shooting the messenger. I'm only pointing out the difference between ALPA protocol (leaking bits of information prematurely, perhaps for ulterior purposes in some cases) versus SWAPA, who has been absolutely tight-lipped, as Rob alluded to above, as it should be.

It's a huge difference in levels of professionalism. And, by the way, a resulting difference in reliability, no matter how many sources you quote.
 
Unfortunately, MKE will probably close. I can't make a guess on MCO. Can someone share the number of pilots currently based in MCO with the number of gates used? Thanks.
44 717 CA's
43 717 F/O's
29 737 CA's
25 737 F/O's

They upgraded 5 MCO F/O's to CA end of last year and didn't hire pilots to replace them so we're a bit short-staffed on the F/O side.

Gates 90-97, 8 gates.

We're told MCO was opened post-constructive-date so even though it was PLANNED and the vacancy was being bid on when the notice came out, that it's not recognized as a 737 base and, thus, all 737 pilots will be considered ATL-based - no base holding rights for 737 crews, we all get displaced once we go through training.

The 717 pilots, since it's fenced and a different fleet type in MCO, get to stay in MCO (at least unless and until those planes are re-deployed elsewhere).
 
It is sad the narcissistic posting of partial details when all sides have been asked not to post anything yet, as well as non disclosures.
I didn't get a memo not to post anything... it's being discussed on our internal forum. Did you guys get some kind of memo we didn't?
 
Every gate in ATL will be filled with an RON aircraft, that seems to be the one constant in our system. Wherever we go, every gate is pretty much full the next morning..even in the hubs/bases. I would say it points to complete gate utilization from the beginning of the day to the last arrival.
Nashville's not. There's at least 15 gates and only 5 RON aircraft on a regular basis (according to our BNA gate agents). Not that it means anything, just throwing it out there.
 
I'll add let's look at MDW as an example. I would assume ATL would eventually have more departures than MDW. Chicago currently has 1,061 pilots.

It will not be as big as Midway. Chicago as a town has twice as many people (local traffic) and is a great location in the middle of the country for a stop on the way to the east or west coast. Atlanta doesn't have enough local traffic and is too close to MCO IMHO.
 
It will not be as big as Midway. Chicago as a town has twice as many people (local traffic) and is a great location in the middle of the country for a stop on the way to the east or west coast. Atlanta doesn't have enough local traffic and is too close to MCO IMHO.

So ATL is to have fewer daily departures than MDW? That's not what I'm hearing.
 
The SWA guys are in lock down out of respect for the process. We want a balanced discussion in the proper context of the whole agreement not to keep slinging mud and pissing each other off. Both sides have lumps in the deal so the context of what was the negotiated middle ground is bound to keep brining up heated discussion. Our executive wants us to wait till the final wording comes out.
 
Lear 70

Thank you for sharing what you have. This Southwest pilot appreciates it. I won't shoot the messenger. This is a rumor board and people are free to view the information for what it is.

RWAV
 
Thank you for sharing what you have. This Southwest pilot appreciates it. I won't shoot the messenger. This is a rumor board and people are free to view the information for what it is.

RWAV

I agree. I just hope all on this board will be as mature as you with this "rumored" information. Somehow I doubt that will happen.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top