Well, try to remember, there are no swa pilots happy about the SLI either and none of us get a pay raise in 3 years- just a 1000 pilots put over the top of me from an airline I could have got on with years before swa- so instead of reliving that, do as I myself do, and remember the 10,000 well qualified that would love to be in class tomorrow under all of us-
You're talking to the wrong guy, wave. I didn't bring up the SLI, your fellow SWA pilot Beechdriver did. I have no desire to keep rehashing the SLI nonsense, but if people like him insist on telling us that we passed up some great deal, then a few of us aren't afraid to speak up and call BS. If guys like him would just drop it, then you'd never hear another peep out of me about it.
But not sure your mentality is proving your statement- which is a pretty human response- look at your posts here- they seem way more negative and anti-swa than most AT pilots I know.
My posts here have to do with reality, they aren't anti-SWA. The reality is that Gary is looking for productivity enhancements. Those are his own words. It's not "anti-SWA" to acknowledge that and start talking about what it may mean for all of us. The idea that you can never speak unless it's a rose colored glasses outlook on everything is absurd.
For instance- we don't like the SLI- but do love this company and are positive about the future for everyone on board- you very much don't appear to feel that way
Oh, I'm quite positive about the future. But being positive doesn't mean being delusional. And frankly, it's delusional to believe that there aren't going to be changes in Section 6, some that everyone won't like very much. That's just reality, not negativity.