Is the Pool draining faster than we thought with a Poolie factor of 1.44 as someone posted before?
Lets look at the Numbers. Right now we have heard that DirtyNasty #46 on our list is slated for the 17 Feb class. 3 Classes at 20 per class for a total of 60. We theorically have had 46 of those 60 slots.
I think that the big bulge of unknown pooliees was at the front of the list, with only a few unknown scattered throughout our known poolies.
As a current and qualified Algebra 1 Math teacher, I guesstimate that the new poolie factor is 1.161 and not 1.44, and that #155 on our list makes it into class during the "Hopefully" 2nd class in May.
Using y=mx+b and inverting it to point-slope format of y-y1=m(x-x1) we can make a best fit line to determine our hopefull results. Now that assumes, that the planets align, and a butterfly in the Amazon doesn't flap it's wings to hard, causing total disruption of my hypothisis.
Lets look at the Numbers. Right now we have heard that DirtyNasty #46 on our list is slated for the 17 Feb class. 3 Classes at 20 per class for a total of 60. We theorically have had 46 of those 60 slots.
I think that the big bulge of unknown pooliees was at the front of the list, with only a few unknown scattered throughout our known poolies.
As a current and qualified Algebra 1 Math teacher, I guesstimate that the new poolie factor is 1.161 and not 1.44, and that #155 on our list makes it into class during the "Hopefully" 2nd class in May.
Using y=mx+b and inverting it to point-slope format of y-y1=m(x-x1) we can make a best fit line to determine our hopefull results. Now that assumes, that the planets align, and a butterfly in the Amazon doesn't flap it's wings to hard, causing total disruption of my hypothisis.