Oh great, Flopgut's back. Here comes the airline infastructure history lesson Part II. That age 60 thread was the best thing to happen to this site in years. It kept you tied up for a while!
I quit paying attention for a while, and all of a sudden you guys got Chase "frontin & stuntin" like the SWA/FO

imp: !
Seriously guys, who doesn't like building runways? Airport improvements are cool, we're all going to use them. Tis the season!
Love Field involved the most contentious airport fight ever, is HQ to the most profitable US airline in history, and somehow doesn't meet it's funding requirements?! Poor form guys.
I think the WA got solved pretty clean, but what SWA should have done is bought it. The whole airport. Matter of fact, buy King CO, and a few others! It's expensive compared to the LA fee increases, but then you could do what you want and no one can argue with you.
Or is it that airport improvement costs should always be another airlines' burden? You didn't go to DFW, you've had fee drama with DEN and SEA, you don't take care of Love, what's the deal?
PS: I'm mellowed out, may not sound like it. I moved so I don't have my SWA pilot neighbor. Everything's cool and I'm glad you guys continue to pull down big money (one less pilot group to worry about). Merry Christmas and all, I'm just good naturedly disagreeing on airport stuff.