malibuVride
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2010
- Posts
- 51
Now that being said if the company comes asking for concessions to avoid furloughs, which I STRONGLY believe they will, will SWAPA give or not? I don't know. In either case if the company follows through they win. If we give them concessions the company benfits from reduced expenses. If we don't, and they furlough, the company benefits from reduced expenses and it serves as a warning to the other employee groups.
I really hate these threads that hash out the merits of taking concessions to avoid furloughs!
First, nobody has come asking SWAPA for concessions or discussed furloughs.
Second, and most important is not to get fooled into giving concessions because of the threat of furlough. Threatening to furlough and actually furloughing are two different things. A classic strong arm tactic is to con unions into concessions with the threat of furlough. But if concessions are given, how can the union ever know if the furloughs were real or just a threat? The concessions are a sucker play!!!
IF management comes with this proposal, the best choice is to look GK in the eye and dare him to furlough. Give up nothing! He will not only be the first SWA CEO to furlough, but the first of the recent consolidations to result in job loss for pilots. And all at a time when the company is poised to cash in on many new revenue initiatives.
Anyone thinking of how much they can give needs to step away from the keyboard, take a breath and man up!