SWA/FL Codeshare

[madjack]

We get it u wanted our pay, benefits, seats and seniority... U didn't get it

 

[General Lee]

We get it u wanted our pay, benefits, seats and seniority... U didn't get it

I think the Process Agreement allowed a Neutral to decide what was fair. Somehow, it never got that far. That is what is remembered.


Bye Bye---General Lee

 

[PCL_128]

Guess you didn't see where he called me d!ckhead? Payback General thats all.

Yes, but in his defense, you are a d!ckhead.

 

[SWA/FO]

Yes, but in his defense, you are a d!ckhead.

You guys don't like the bed that you made for yourselves.... so sad. I guess, you're lucky that Gary Kelly didn't tell us what was on his mind either (that the 717s were going away). That would have been an excellent piece of info for SWAPA. Get over it. Yes IMO people would have voted yes, regardless of some threat.....thats why the 7 wonder pilots shot it down, they knew it would pass.

Remember, "Its not about the money" - I guess it is now, huh? :bawling:

 

[Lear70]

OK, went back and tried to find the Gary Kelly letter after the SIA 1 vote, and couldn't find it, it was on Flica and they purge that after a few months so it's gone now, but here's a few tidbits from right after that:

Airtran MEC Special Message

August 22, 2011

Fellow Pilots,
Last week, your MEC made the difficult decision to turn down the Seniority Integration Agreements (SIA) that the Merger Committee reached with SWAPA and SWA management. While the MEC sincerely appreciated SWA management's efforts on the economic aspects of the agreement, MEC members, based on pilot input received, believe firmly that the seniority list itself could not be considered “fair and equitable” to our members. That seniority list resulted in an average loss of relative seniority of 22% for AirTran pilots and over a 30% loss of relative seniority for some of our pilots. The MEC appreciates the hard work by all parties that lead to the development of conditions and restrictions (C&Rs) that lessened the effects of the seniority loss for some AirTran pilots, but the MEC ultimately concluded that the agreement could not and would not be ratified by our pilots.

I have been in contact today with Bob Jordan to explain the MEC’s decision and express the above concerns. Although Southwest management is disappointed that the agreement was not ratified, they have also agreed that the Seniority Integration Process Agreement (SIPA) details the additional mediation and arbitration steps required. The Merger Committee continues their work this week in Washington, D.C. to prepare for mediation, which is scheduled to begin at the end of this month and continue through September. More information will be coming out shortly from the Merger Committee to describe the mediation process.

Many of you have reviewed Gary Kelly’s letter and/or listened to his phone message this afternoon. His plainly stated disappointment with the failure of the agreement is obvious, and some of his comments related to reviewing the status of the integration process are concerning. However, there were also many positive aspects of Mr. Kelly's message. First, he stated that "the integration process will continue, but at a much slower pace." He goes on to say that the company is "still on track for a single operating certificate," early next year, which is an important hurdle to clear for any airline merger. And I believe most importantly, he was clear to say that "our jobs are secure."

I want to stress that AirTran pilot leadership and all members of the MEC and its committees are still fully committed to a respectful and constructive integration process -- and one that provides the basis for continuing Southwest’s long record of success and positive culture.

Conversations with SWA management have included discussion of a meeting with them in the coming days. We hope to continue efforts to identify and work on any possible ideas that could eliminate the current logjam. We hope that those discussions will continue to highlight the many positives to an efficient and fair integration rather than focus on steps that are not likely to promote our shared goals. Mr. Kelly importantly reminded everyone to “take a deep breath” and keep working hard. That is exactly what we intend to do.

We also urge you to please follow Gary's advice about not listening to rumor and innuendo. You have my personal assurance that your union will communicate with you throughout this process and make sure that you have the most up-to-date, and more importantly, the most accurate information available. If you hear a rumor that doesn't match what you've heard from your union, please contact the MEC Office or a P2P member to get the real scoop.

In service,

Linden Hillman, Chairman
AirTran Master Executive Council

What Linden left out of that, from the Gary Kelly letter that was in Flica, was this lovely excerpt:

"But again, given the current circumstances, we’ll now begin evaluating all options in addition to, or in lieu of, arbitration. We’ve withdrawn our offer, in light of the current economic circumstances, which is probably the prudent thing to do anyway. You know, this means that the integration process will continue, but will definitely work at a much slower pace."

Then, a few weeks later, this from a Southwest interview:

Southwest Considers Stand-Alone AirTran If Pilot Vote Fails

By Mary Schlangenstein and Mary Jane Credeur - Oct 11, 2011 2:36 PM MT


Southwest Airlines (LUV),told pilots it would keep operating newly acquired Air Tran Holdings as a stand-alone carrier if union members don’t agree to combine seniority lists. Southwest briefed pilots on a “Plan B” for “separate and unintegrated” operations after that union declined to hold a membership election on a seniority proposal, according to an AirTran union summary obtained by Bloomberg News. Pilots at both airlines are now voting until Nov. 7 on a new agreement.

Keeping AirTran flying on its own would run counter to the goal of folding the discount carrier into Southwest, the biggest low-fare airline. Dallas-based Southwest paid $1 billion in cash and stock in May to buy AirTran, winning access to fly into Atlanta, home of the world’s busiest airport.

“I’m sure that’s not what management planned when they acquired AirTran,” said Hunter Keay, a Wolfe Trahan & Co. analyst in New York who recommends holding Southwest. “It probably is to some degree a negotiating tactic.”

Pilots’ approval of one seniority list would give Southwest a timeline to blend workforces and fleets, and set union members’ rankings for pay, schedules and the types of jets they fly. For AirTran pilots, ratification will mean “certainty of integration,” Southwest said in a Sept. 22 letter to union members.

Staying Flexible

Southwest has met with pilots to explain “what that vote is and what it does,” Beth Harbin, a Southwest Airlines spokeswoman, said in an interview today. “Absent approval, we have to think about, ‘Where is the flexibility?’”

Harbin declined to discuss the AirTran union summary or what options Southwest would consider if pilots don’t accept the new seniority agreement.

“I’m certainly not going to go into any detail about what that flexibility is,” Harbin said. “Our focus is going to be on getting the deal with the pilots done quickly because that really does set a good momentum for the rest of the integration.”

In between those two events were the negotiations and discussions I mentioned, where they very clearly laid out how they would not integrate us if they so chose, including the Board meeting which fell that Friday and can be verified through your own Board meeting minutes.

The threats were not very subtle at all. Do I think we would have been integrated eventually? Yes, they sold the deal to the DoJ and DoT on an integrated operation and no job loss which would be the basis for a lawsuit with teeth and injunctions to go along with it. Does it matter now? Not in the least. The threat accomplished its purpose; they scared the bejesus out of the pilot group, they started recalling reps and writing letters begging to be simply stapled, started FB pages for the same thing, etc, etc, and we had no choice but to take whatever it was GK then offered.

Checkmate.

Just for the "you weren't threatened" crowd, one last time so that people understand it in the proper perspective. Absent those threats, SIA 2 never sees the light of day and we go to arbitration. With those threats... we are where we are.

 

[General Lee]

OK, went back and tried to find the Gary Kelly letter after the SIA 1 vote, and couldn't find it, it was on Flica and they purge that after a few months so it's gone now, but here's a few tidbits from right after that:


What Linden left out of that, from the Gary Kelly letter that was in Flica, was this lovely excerpt:



Then, a few weeks later, this from a Southwest interview:



In between those two events were the negotiations and discussions I mentioned, where they very clearly laid out how they would not integrate us if they so chose, including the Board meeting which fell that Friday and can be verified through your own Board meeting minutes.

The threats were not very subtle at all. Do I think we would have been integrated eventually? Yes, they sold the deal to the DoJ and DoT on an integrated operation and no job loss which would be the basis for a lawsuit with teeth and injunctions to go along with it. Does it matter now? Not in the least. The threat accomplished its purpose; they scared the bejesus out of the pilot group, they started recalling reps and writing letters begging to be simply stapled, started FB pages for the same thing, etc, etc, and we had no choice but to take whatever it was GK then offered.

Checkmate.

Just for the "you weren't threatened" crowd, one last time so that people understand it in the proper perspective. Absent those threats, SIA 2 never sees the light of day and we go to arbitration. With those threats... we are where we are.

But Lear, 83% voted for the second offer, so everyone HAD TO BE HAPPY WITH IT. It passed by such a WIDE margin........tic....



Bye Bye---General Lee

 

[ASADFW7]

General how is your brother doing?

 

[General Lee]

General how is your brother doing?

He's good. I talked to him over the weekend, and he's busy. How's your wife and my kids? (sorry, I had to do it....)


Bye Bye---General Lee

 

[PCL_128]

Remember, "Its not about the money" - I guess it is now, huh? :bawling:

Um, no, still don't give a flying f^&* about the money.

 

[Dude]

What's it about then? Schedule? Junior here is better than senior at most. ATL? Base starting small but will be huge in a few years.

What do you care about, PCL? What is important and why did you commit yourself to the career path?

Honestly asking to understand your perspective.