Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA/FL Codeshare

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Why?

I'm simply looking at what I make now versus what I'll make there .

But that's part of the rub Lear. The contract your under now is because of Southwest. Not saying it shouldn't be better (or that you thought you were shorted), but it was almost instantly after the announcement to purchase was released...poof, a new improved contract from what you had. So what you had before the SW announcement vs. what you would have on this side of the fence would be a more realistic comparison. You may never agree with me, but that's the true apples to apples difference. How many more years was Joe going to continue to stonewall you?
 
But that's part of the rub Lear. The contract your under now is because of Southwest. Not saying it shouldn't be better (or that you thought you were shorted), but it was almost instantly after the announcement to purchase was released...poof, a new improved contract from what you had. So what you had before the SW announcement vs. what you would have on this side of the fence would be a more realistic comparison. You may never agree with me, but that's the true apples to apples difference. How many more years was Joe going to continue to stonewall you?

However, because BF was simultaneously in talks with SWA for a merger during the last year of our contract talks those talks were stalled (from management's side) because they had no incentive to move on and get a deal. They were waiting for a conclusion to merger talks before moving on to the pilots. So, in some ways SWA artificially lengthened the negotiations. As to exactly where the quality of the contract would have ended up with/without a merger is arguable.
 

Is that bad?

Referencing senior or junior making the transition. You have a good number of folks that transitioned from MKE and MCO. There are some relatively junior capts and FO's who got to transition out of seniority because they were at those bases. I think it would have been more fair to put those slots up to the whole group and then do a reduction notice for the base. That way a more senior AT FO gets the pay raise and a more senior AT Capt doesn't have to commute.

Red; Joe retired a while back. The common denominator in all our negotiations was Kolski.
 
There's plenty of mid 2004 hires that have transitioned over. I'm one of them and I was ATL based. I was also a captain my last 4 years at the Tran. Pay wise I break even at around 95 TFP.
 
There's plenty of mid 2004 hires that have transitioned over. I'm one of them and I was ATL based. I was also a captain my last 4 years at the Tran. Pay wise I break even at around 95 TFP.

More 717 slots transitioned in year one. I suppose my example is geared more towards the 737. Thanks for the pay comparison. Many of our folks try to convert the two pays using hourly rate instead of TFP an it skews the numbers.
 
But that's part of the rub Lear. The contract your under now is because of Southwest. Not saying it shouldn't be better (or that you thought you were shorted), but it was almost instantly after the announcement to purchase was released...poof, a new improved contract from what you had. So what you had before the SW announcement vs. what you would have on this side of the fence would be a more realistic comparison. You may never agree with me, but that's the true apples to apples difference. How many more years was Joe going to continue to stonewall you?


Yup, that's the truth. We were getting nowhere with no end in sight, except Joe was gone and it was Bob F. who was at the helm.
 
Roger about the K-man vs Joey. Anyway, water under the bridge. I'd like to see it all behind us quickly but they never called for my opinion.
 
But that's part of the rub Lear. The contract your under now is because of Southwest. Not saying it shouldn't be better (or that you thought you were shorted), but it was almost instantly after the announcement to purchase was released...poof, a new improved contract from what you had. So what you had before the SW announcement vs. what you would have on this side of the fence would be a more realistic comparison. You may never agree with me, but that's the true apples to apples difference. How many more years was Joe going to continue to stonewall you?

There is the rub Red. Why do you still have 2 seperate contracts? Say WHAT???? HUH????? WHY? SWAPA should have stopped that. A JOINT contract should have been done. Without one, it's hard to feel "the luv." Let's look at RECENT mergers. Which ones have been considered "successful", and which ones have been considered "a train wreck?" You guys had the chance to look at both before your own transaction. Which road did you take? HMMMMMMM. The WRONG ONE. But, overall your group did better, which is why there is a problem. Higher pay always takes the STING away from SLI bad feelings. You did that, but one guy at a time going to Corndog Highschool.

What is funny to many of us is that you thought the feeling "Hey, I'm now a Corndog. That's enough for me to feel AWESOME. I'll wait for the pay later" was going to work...... Red, money talks.


Bye Bye---General Lee
 
Roger about the K-man vs Joey. Anyway, water under the bridge. I'd like to see it all behind us quickly but they never called for my opinion.


Nobody will call you Red, nobody has your Mom's basement phone number. And I bet a lot of you would like to see this all behind you, but hard feelings can linger...


Bye Bye---General Lee
 

Latest resources

Back
Top