redflyer65
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2004
- Posts
- 4,456
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well you can't have it both ways can General. I will gladly take SWA approach to single fleet at the expense of pilot movement. Especially when the fleet is transport category. We actually wanted Boeing to add a aux tank and a fuselage plug to the 717 so we could stay single fleet. But there just weren't any other buyers. Plus the 800 and 900 open some doors too. It seems to be working for Alaska too. I get what your saying, but profitability is way more important to me than flying twin aisle.
Single fleet type is a massive cost difference. Not just the huge number of parts that are need to keep on-hand, but just as the General states above, the training cost are exorbitant. (remember there are eleven training events for one retirement).
General, I'm not sure that either of our carriers are doing it exactly right. We should probably end up with another aircraft type or two when we start expanding internationally, but you should probably scale back to fewer aircraft types. There really isn't any need for an airline to operate the DC-9, the MD-88, the MD-90, the 737, and the A319/320. I mean, seriously? On the other hand, flying to Europe or South America in a stretch 737 isn't really an appealing idea, either. There should be a happy middle ground in there somewhere.
Not really. Even though we have an all 737 fleet, they consist of different blocks of 300, 500, 700, and now 800. Example, when the convertible option became a problem in the 300, we only had to look at 100 or so airframes 300's, not every 300 and not any 5's or 7's.However, our single fleet type poses some risks too!
Take a look at www.myseniority.com
I wouldn't mess around with those things, they are bad juju.
Is the fourth stripe really all that important? An FO at SWA is still making a wheelbarrow full of money. I'd think that a nice paycheck with some decent seniority would be a helluva lot more valuable than the extra stripe.
True, and it is the cost of doing business. It is up to management to decide which planes it wants where. If it brings in 4 times the profit than domestic airlines, then great. A lot of it is figuring out where the planes should go to make money. Right now Asia is hot, but Europe isn't doing great lately due to the economic mess. Luckily, some of the planes that go there can be moved to Asia or South America. That is what is good about having the right sized fleet. During the Summer the A330s do a lot of Europe out of our biggest hub, ATL. After the loads drop off a bit in September, those A330s start to switch to other regions, and 767ERs replace them. The 744s and 777s usually do trunk routes that have a lot of cargo and have pretty good loads year round, like LAX to SYD. If you had 100 744s, and economies tanked all around the World, that might be really bad.
Sorry about the thread creep. Hopefully your SWA upgrades continue at a fast pace...
Bye Bye---General Lee
So speaking of upgrades, when are you wearing the 4stripes in the B777 or B744, GL?
GL
So u are saying as 96 hire u can hold captain in ATL ?