Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA Enters PHL-BOS market...fares 1/10th of US Air

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I just find it interesting that you morons are so entranced by Southwest Airlines that you end up on every thread that contains the word "Southwest". I really could give a crap what goes on at any other airline, it really doesn't interest me at all. So I don't understand the weird behavior.

And yet you wrote just this 2 posts above:

And you work at Delta? Many would say that RJ's killed the industry, and what airline was the first to allow it's feeder to fly a jet? "Scope out RJ's" :laugh: your username is a pathetic parody of your ineffectiveness of your own pilot group.
More swa hypocrisy at it's finest!

I suppose there are some people who have an unhealthy obsession with an airline, although I really can't understand the sickness. Or maybe I am wrong, maybe I'll just check some of the other threads that have "Southwest" in the title to see if my theory is correct. You guys are actually freaking me out, you're kind of like a bunch of stalkers. yuck!!

Buh bye canyonblue.......See you in another 3 months!:bawling:
 
Southwest should charge fares that are in line with it's costs. $59 fares are preditory and designed to hurt the competitor more than stimulate travel. A $300 fare would at least have the appearance of being a legitimate fare.
 
Southwest should charge fares that are in line with it's costs. $59 fares are preditory and designed to hurt the competitor more than stimulate travel. A $300 fare would at least have the appearance of being a legitimate fare.

Funny, do realize how many up starts where killed by the LLC s , just doing what you claim SWA should not be doing to the LLCs ?

I guess its a one way street....
 
Southwest should charge fares that are in line with it's costs. $59 fares are preditory and designed to hurt the competitor more than stimulate travel. A $300 fare would at least have the appearance of being a legitimate fare.

BUB,

Actually the cost for this 280 mile flight is a higher seat cost per mile than our longer flights....flights under 500 miles have been the routes where SWA has not been making money on so that is why our recent fare sales have targeted those routes more than the longer ones.

No all seats sell for $59 obviously but it will certainly get the buzz going and we'll fill up a larger number of those seats with more expensive seats.

Not to mention saving our customers hundreds of dollars which can be used for other products or for their families. I think that is a pretty good thing to be proud of.
 
No Scope=Corporate America has killed the airline industry, and many other industries !!

SWA=highest paid employees.. Just doesn't have 10 buildings like AA,UN,DL with 500 vice presidents, and directors taking huge money on the backs of average Americans !!

Americans one day will get tired of this behavior !! Its coming !! Remember it is the UNITED STATES !!! No CEO is worth over 2 million a year. DL's=10 million, do you think he is worth that? NO

Scarlet,

I couldn't agree with you more. Why do we need all of this brilliant management? It is totally out of control.
 
No Scope=Corporate America has killed the airline industry, and many other industries !!

SWA=highest paid employees.. Just doesn't have 10 buildings like AA,UN,DL with 500 vice presidents, and directors taking huge money on the backs of average Americans !!

Americans one day will get tired of this behavior !! Its coming !! Remember it is the UNITED STATES !!! No CEO is worth over 2 million a year. DL's=10 million, do you think he is worth that? NO

Didn't SWA just now pay for VNAV?? There's a cost advantage right there....and all these years I thought it was Fuel Hedging or not doing the required maintenance....How sorry I am for not seeing how great SWA is!!
 
Turn your clock back 10 years------>SWA=LOWEST paid employees!
But when you have people that are willing to work for substandard wages, and pay for their training, then you have a new low in the industry that has been set as the standard.

A -- Not entirely true.
B -- Where did you work before you became a DAL U-boat commander ??
 
Southwest should charge fares that are in line with it's costs. $59 fares are preditory and designed to hurt the competitor more than stimulate travel. A $300 fare would at least have the appearance of being a legitimate fare.

Have you ever bought ANYTHING on sale? It's called marketing.

Gup
 

Latest resources

Back
Top