SWA delaying new planes, adding used Westjet birds --article

[Tripower455]

Why do you feel that you were entitled to "get much" from a company business transaction? Did your mommy give you a "participation trophy" when you played soccer as a kid? Did you teachers tell you how "special" you were? Did you actually believe it? Because I can't figure out any other reason that you would somehow feel entitled to gain something from a decision that management made without your input or involvement.

The same can be asked of you.

 

[PCL_128]

The same can be asked of you.

Not quite. Unlike redflyer and other SWA whiners, I've never expected to gain anything from this merger. I just wanted what I came in with: my seat, my base, and my seniority.

 

[redflyer65]

Not quite. Unlike redflyer and other SWA whiners, I've never expected to gain anything from this merger. I just wanted what I came in with: my seat, my base, and my seniority.

No whining here. I'm happy where I am.

But from your perspective, you should have gotten a 40-90% payraise across the board....then your base....and your seat, AND keep your seniority.

Talk about out of touch with reality.

 

[climbhappy]

Not quite. Unlike redflyer and other SWA whiners, I've never expected to gain anything from this merger. I just wanted what I came in with: my seat, my base, and my seniority.

haven't you just become your counter points..? wanting something from a mgt decision that did not get your input..? ..sometimes being on outside gives you a much better perspective...

you guys have no cards to play and even if you think you do, in the end it will be a lost cause....know when to fold 'em.

you AT guys are like gamblers in the SWA casino.....the house always wins...(just my opinion...by all means play on..)

 

[redflyer65]

Why do you feel that you were entitled to "get much" from a company business transaction? Did your mommy give you a "participation trophy" when you played soccer as a kid? Did you teachers tell you how "special" you were? Did you actually believe it? Because I can't figure out any other reason that you would somehow feel entitled to gain something from a decision that management made without your input or involvement.

Honestly PCL, I didn't expect to get anything from the deal. I know the Delta guys got a big stock payout and the Airtran pilots got a nice pay increase. It is what it is.

Obviously you expected to get everything.

 

[General Lee]

Not quite. Unlike redflyer and other SWA whiners, I've never expected to gain anything from this merger. I just wanted what I came in with: my seat, my base, and my seniority.

Even with arbitration, that may have been tough to get. You probably would have had your current seat, and since you were a smaller airline you might have gotten a little less seniority. Base wise, a purchasing company can do whatever they want with that (ie CVG shrunk, along with MEM). I think there could have been more Capt awards for the AT guys in binding arbitration, but it appears the SWA guys didn't want any AT guys in the left seat of the 737s, even YOUR 737s you were bringing over, and options too. That is what is interesting here, and nobody wants to answer why that is......Maybe you don't know how to fly it like they do, except to INTL destinations..... Who knows?? I do know that some Capt seats would have been given to AT pilots in arbitration, especially since you were bringing 737s to the table.


Bye Bye---General Lee

 

[madjack]

They had the seats and gave them up...

 

[General Lee]

No one knows what would have happened in an arbitration because it never happened. I suspect an arbitrated award would resemble the first AIP more closely than the deal that was voted in. But all anyone can do is speculate about something that never happened.

What I was commenting on was your false statement. There is a large difference between verifiable factual misrepresentations and meaningless speculation. When you said: "But, zero arbitration awards have NOT included Capt slots at BOTH sides" You are either misinformed or lying to make your point. Which is it?

It wasn't allowed to happen, even though EVERY other merger in the past 5 years allowed it. You see, in MOST mergers the management wants to stay out of pilot politics, so as not to seem favoring one group over the other, and therefore not gaining an upset chunk of pilots. It's never good to have a pretty good sized chunk of pilots upset. When you do arbitration, nobody except the #1 pilot wins, and everyone has someone in common to point the finger at---the arbitrator(s). Then management moves along with the new group and everyone tries to get along. That is how MOST airlines do it. Your group is the exception, and that might not be a good thing....

As far as arbitration awards, look at CURRENT awards (within this last round of mergers) and see what happened. If the airlines are close in size and both bring like sized planes to the table, some Capts keep their seats on BOTH sides. AT wasn't a 5 plane operation, it was significant in size, and brought ATL and DCA slots plus 737s and orders. You may call that insignificant, but an arbitrator would NOT. Welcome to the new World Howie, and I can see why some are upset at the deal. That is allowed, right?


Bye Bye---General Lee

 

[texman]

Why do you feel that you were entitled to "get much" from a company business transaction? Did your mommy give you a "participation trophy" when you played soccer as a kid? Did you teachers tell you how "special" you were? Did you actually believe it? Because I can't figure out any other reason that you would somehow feel entitled to gain something from a decision that management made without your input or involvement.

You don't own the captain seats nor the airplanes AT brings to the table. If you want to talk about business transactions. Just saying!

 

[General Lee]

They had the seats and gave them up...

They wanted a fair deal. That doesn't mean the arbitrators would have sided only with the AT pilots. You bring evidence and testimony to the hearings, and then people that have nothing to gain except the process fee decide what is fair. Sounds like one side was nervous about that. Why be nervous? If you were so confident in your position, you should have won in a landslide, right?

They were given two offers, and not one of them was what they wanted. The second seems like a tougher offer, and that is what upsets many I would assume. That sure doesn't promote loyalty.


Bye Bye---General Lee