Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA blurb

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Originally Posted by lowecur
So give me some information that will refute that 40% of the FA's will not be making $60K.



First of all, the contract hasn't even been ratifed yet. We'll find that out tomorrow. Here's your information...

We have approximately 7000 active flight attendants. My seniority group, 10 years, will be the most junior to top out on this contract. My group and everyone senior to me, who will all top out under this contract, constitute about 2100 flight attendants. That's about 30 percent of us. We would have to fly 100 plus trips per month to make exactly 60k. Not all 2100 of us do that, so now you are looking at less than 30 percent. I have to agree with N1atEcon, that this figure sounds about as acurate at a USA Today article.
 
And Low,

Im still wondering who all of these employees that are telling you "me me me" are?

And if we decide we all need a haircut, why in gods name would we feel the need to consult you?
 
lowlycfi said:
Originally Posted by lowecur
So give me some information that will refute that 40% of the FA's will not be making $60K.



First of all, the contract hasn't even been ratifed yet. We'll find that out tomorrow. Here's your information...

We have approximately 7000 active flight attendants. My seniority group, 10 years, will be the most junior to top out on this contract. My group and everyone senior to me, who will all top out under this contract, constitute about 2100 flight attendants. That's about 30 percent of us. We would have to fly 100 plus trips per month to make exactly 60k. Not all 2100 of us do that, so now you are looking at less than 30 percent. I have to agree with N1atEcon, that this figure sounds about as acurate at a USA Today article.
Thank you. I stand corrected.
 
TexaSWA said:
And Low,

Im still wondering who all of these employees that are telling you "me me me" are? Are you warming up your voice to sing?

And if we decide we all need a haircut, why in gods name would we feel the need to consult you? Well at least you were able to say the word haircut. Now that's a start.
.....
 
Fax number

SW guys. Someone can help me and give me the fax # of Lindsy Lane. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
MLBWINGBORN said:
But..As in the past..If its truly needed for the pilots to help insure the health and future of SWA..I see no reason for history not to repeat itself..

SWAPA and SWA have always had a working relationship that has kept an eye on our health and profitibilty..This isnt going to change due to a Section 6.

Mike
Thanks Mike. I really hope that's the case. :)
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom