SWA/AT future at Risk

[Ty Webb]

If you think your 5 year Captains deserve a spot ahead of our native 11 year FO's you're crazy as hell.

That includes your November 2001 hires Ty.

Gup

I know you want me, Gup, but if you want to fly with me, you're going to have to put in for Check Airman .

Or, you could be a Czech Airman, like my swinging cousin, Yurgy. He is quite the hit at the Fox Bar, where the American girls are very impressed with his many medallions and tight slacks. :laugh:

 

[Ty Webb]

Meaning someone who agrees with your partisan view.



Certainly you are educated enough on the subject to know that this isn't true.

Very disappointing.

No one has yet answered the question-

If AirTran bought Allegiant, and they brought the appropriate number of airframes/pilots, how would a straight-ratio integration, (no bump, no flush) affect my:

• Monthly Line Award
• Domicile (no bump, no flush)
• Vacation
• Pay, lifestyle, pursuit of happiness

 

[scoreboardII]

Your monthly bid could shift down as senior Alegient folks bid into domicile forcing you to weekends, AM's or you might have to move to another domicile to keep or regain these bennies. (Yes, this could happen without aquisition, but it doesn't because equalibrium is already a constant; everyone is where they can or want to be).

Same can be said for vacation (instead of XMas off, you get Jan 21-28), lifestyle, pursuit of happiness.

Pay could be affected by more senior Alegient outbidding your extra flying.

While your relative seniority remains stable, company growth is slowed. This is because your company can only get so big in the environment in which it operates, resulting in slower improvement in your "relative" position in seniority.

Domicile makeup will change, as Allegient is rolled in and fences fall, senior Alegient could move into your house, so to speak.

 

[Midge]

If you think your 5 year Captains deserve a spot ahead of our native 11 year FO's you're crazy as hell.

That includes your November 2001 hires Ty.

Gup

More arrogance! Absolutely amazing some of your guys' head still fits through the cockpit door.

 

[jonjuan]

Well it's a good thing that none of that will happen with a usair/aw type sli. Remember, gk told you this would increase growth and without it, stagnation will occur. In that case, those people who still can't hold weekends off in the base they want or channukah off, would be waiting even longer without the growth at brings to the table. Of course, you probably believe Gary also isn't educated enough on the subject to know that's not true.

 

[ivauir]

Ty,

Despite your merger committee's repeated requests NOT to discuss the SLI why do you persist?

 

[swa737-700]

What a loaded question. How about let arbitrators figure out what is fair? They are paid to do that, and they are "neutral." That is what you are scared of, obviously, anything FAIR determined by a neutral. Your lawyers put out the facts, and someone else decides. It screams FEAR in your book.


Bye Bye--General Lee

General,

Having read your blather for awhile, I find it hard to believe you really work in this industry.
Let arbitrators figure out the SLI. Really? YGBSM. How about the two groups work together, and as a LAST resort turn it over to an arbitrator. And if you think aribitrators have any common sense, look at the recent decision reference Eagle and the TWA folks. Unbelievable.

 

[Ty Webb]

Ty,

Despite your merger committee's repeated requests NOT to discuss the SLI why do you persist?

They asked us to not discuss our expectations, which I have refrained from doing. I simply asked a question.

I think your response showed that you yourself don't understand what the result would be.

In the scenario I described, if they brought the same number of seats with them, then there would be that many more vacation days and lines to bid. Your seniority doesn't change, you just wouldn't be improving your position at anyone else's expense.

Now that we've straightened that out, you have yourself a nice day, mmmkay?

 

[ivauir]

They asked us to not discuss our expectations, which I have refrained from doing. I simply asked a question.

GMAFB

Your expectations are clear and have been since day one. Your question is an obvious gambit to alter someone else's expectations.

I think your response showed that you yourself don't understand what the result would be.

No. However I refuse to get drawn into an SLI discussion.

 

[Ty Webb]

GMAFB

Your expectations are clear and have been since day one. Your question is an obvious gambit to alter someone else's expectations.

You may think that you know what my expectations are, but you really don't. I'm not even sure what I expect . . . . or what the list will look like, so how could you know what I expect.

No. However I refuse to get drawn into an SLI discussion.

Heh-heh . . . . I think you already have been, Br'er Rabbit.