PapaWoody
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2010
- Posts
- 162
Even if it goes relative how does any SWA pilot lose seniority? They don't lose money, they don't lose bidding power, vacation slots, bases, or anything else. You say its not a pilot's seat but the company's who he flies for. Now we all fly for the same company just have different bargaining agents. No SWA guy will lose anything. Even if it goes relative they have not lost any seniority. 99.9% of AAI guys meet and exceed SWA's mins . GK and the shareholders decided they wanted this deal and they made it happen. You can say AAI guys are lesser pilots and lesser people all day long but that doesn't make it so. You have earned your job and we have earned ours. Get over yourself. You are no better than the other thousands of pilots out there.
27, you generally have reasonable posts, and I don't doubt that this one was intended to be the same, so my rebuttal is not intended to be combative. However, to say that no SWA guy will lose anything if this were to go relative is incorrect. Seniority determines a lot of things, including vacation, bidding for premium time, etc. So if this were to go relative, every SWA guy would lose money because of the inherent slowing of their movement up the seniority list that would occur due to growth and retirements (the majority of the retirements being on the SWA side for the next 20 years). Not sure the amount of money to be lost, but considering I upgraded before age 60 changed and the stagnation caused by that is costing me approx. $30k a year, the losses would be substantial, especially for the junior guys. Given this, it would hardly be fair for a pilot who has been at AirTran for less time than we've been at SWA to not only get an average $1.5 million bump in his career earnings and get seniority that their longevity does not support, while the SWA guys and gals would lose money over the course of their career. Fair and equitable cuts both ways.
Respectfully,
PapaWoody