redflyer65
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2004
- Posts
- 4,456
They're in a completely different scenario and have some strange issues about their own management (Republic) trying to keep the Airbus guys in their seats for a while. Who can blame them, the training costs could get EXTREMELY expensive very quickly (which could also happen here if there aren't fences in place to keep a bunch of seat shuffling from happening right off the bat).
I don't see EITHER union MC as "holding the process up". I see two sides negotiating for the interests of THEIR OWN pilots, as it should be, and unable to reach an agreement, so they table the issue and try to work on other things and come back to it at a later date.
Depending on your point of view, you could argue that EITHER side is causing the delay. It's all relative... excuse the pun. Not that a small delay matters, at the end of the day, DOCC isn't for another 3 months or so. Plenty of time to hammer it out.
The question that concerns me, as I mentioned earlier, is WHY that item is not something SWAPA wants to agree to. I fully back our MC's decision NOT to sign a Process Agreement without that protection in place and if that delays its signing, so be it. Until we're all on the same team, we each have to look out for our own best interests. It's not personal, just business.
Lear,
My point is that arbitors are professionals at dragging their feet. Time and time again. I don't know one case that was quick.
I believe that most of the time they know exactly how they will rule within a month, but never rule on an issue for 6-12 months or longer..