Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA/AAI and the flight deck jumpseat

  • Thread starter Thread starter JT12345
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 54

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Can we start a new thread.

***********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************





The 35 pages of this arguing proves my point that the flight deck is no place for this discussion with our jumpseat future brothers from another mother.





**************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
 
Last edited:
The 35 pages of this arguing proves my point that the flight deck is no place for this discussion with our jumpseat future brothers from another mother.

What do ya want us to do, Look for porn? :nuts:
 
Still trying to put words in my mouth, wave? You couldn't be more wrong. I think this merger is better for everyone. I'm quite happy about it.

Nope- telling you my perception of you from this board.
Even that last line. "Better for everyone" it's a subtle way to say your negotiating position. You HAVE to include that it's good for Swapa pilots too even though the only person anyone can speak for is themselves- why can't you speak for you only and say its a good deal on your end- instead of trying to speak for us? Why can't you still acknowledge the financial benefit you'll receive as a benefit?

It's bc you know that weakens your position- and no matter what good deal you're getting, you won't give an inch to that.
And you're contained excitement is what gets to swa pilots. This is airline 6 for me and I know what run of the mill airlines are- this isn't one- and it annoys me to know end when some downplays their good luck by saying they are only "quite" happy. How happy? "Quite".
It annoys all of us. Bc we know this is a special place- and if you don't agree we'd rather not have you. And yes, it's a good point that you have spent years treading on swa. And all of us haven't forgotten it anymore than we did your Gulfsteeam shortcut past.

But since you're engaging me- I do have a question-

Were you wrong PCL when you said AT wouldn't do well in an acquisition by swa? Just what did you mean by that and what if anything do you think has changed?

Or are you looking out for #1 now that it's happened.
(8,000 clambering for a chance to be at the bottom of all of us- please remember that)
 
Nope- telling you my perception of you from this board.
Even that last line. "Better for everyone" it's a subtle way to say your negotiating position. You HAVE to include that it's good for Swapa pilots too even though the only person anyone can speak for is themselves- why can't you speak for you only and say its a good deal on your end- instead of trying to speak for us? Why can't you still acknowledge the financial benefit you'll receive as a benefit?

It's bc you know that weakens your position- and no matter what good deal you're getting, you won't give an inch to that.
And you're contained excitement is what gets to swa pilots. This is airline 6 for me and I know what run of the mill airlines are- this isn't one- and it annoys me to know end when some downplays their good luck by saying they are only "quite" happy. How happy? "Quite".
It annoys all of us. Bc we know this is a special place- and if you don't agree we'd rather not have you. And yes, it's a good point that you have spent years treading on swa. And all of us haven't forgotten it anymore than we did your Gulfsteeam shortcut past.

But since you're engaging me- I do have a question-

Were you wrong PCL when you said AT wouldn't do well in an acquisition by swa? Just what did you mean by that and what if anything do you think has changed?

Or are you looking out for #1 now that it's happened.
(8,000 clambering for a chance to be at the bottom of all of us- please remember that)

Easy answer, he was correct at the time when he wrote that post given the context of the wonderful deal that was offered to the Frontier pilots. SWAPA and you would have demanded a staple, thankfully for us, you won't get it. So, yes PCL was correct, if you and SWAPA had your wet dream, we wouldn't do well in a merger.
 
It's not a merger. F9 should have taken a staple, they would have been better off now. This is a great deal for trannies. This is a once in a lifetime opportunity. Be smart.
 
Easy answer, he was correct at the time when he wrote that post given the context of the wonderful deal that was offered to the Frontier pilots.

Wrong answer, his post was over a year before we bid for Frontier. And I don't believe he was asking you anyway, unless you and PCL have a ventriloquist act going on here.
 
Were you wrong PCL when you said AT wouldn't do well in an acquisition by swa? Just what did you mean by that and what if anything do you think has changed?

At that time, we had basically no protections in our CBA for acquisition situations. The new scope section changes all of that, with clear requirements for merging the operations and the pilot groups within a set period of time. In addition, there is now a 4-party Process Agreement that lays out a fair process for resolving the seniority issues. With those two things together, I have no worries about where this is going.
 
Wrong answer, his post was over a year before we bid for Frontier. And I don't believe he was asking you anyway, unless you and PCL have a ventriloquist act going on here.

The way our Union is set up is that people like PCL speak for me and I tell them what to say. I don't have time to read through his posts from years back like you, sorry. Hopefully he answered your question but I'm sure you will have more to complain about. Have a nice day!
 
Hopefully he answered your question but I'm sure you will have more to complain about. Have a nice day!

It wasn't my question, please follow along, we can't slow the group down. And no complaints here, it's always a nice day here at Southwest Airlines.
 
Those guys with the stuck mic were sure complaining quite a bit.

I can only imagine the TV Station refrained from airing their thoughts on the acquisition. Wouldn't be family viewing.
 
The way our Union is set up is that people like PCL speak for me and I tell them what to say.

Hold up now! PCL doesn't purport to speak for anyone at AirTran but himself. Just want to be clear on that. :)
 
PCL, it is too late dude, you ran your mouth while in office, you didn't hide your position when it became apparent that you could not keep quite. You are either narcissistic, immature, or naive? Now saying you only speak for yourself is disingenuous. You are not very mature in the world of aviation, and not very professional representing ALPA on a public web board.
 
I would absolutely turn these quotes in to an arbitrator. He/she probably will wait 5 seconds before they laugh and then belch. Who cares?



Bye Bye--General Lee

Who cares? You obviously do. You took the time to comment on it.

Try to be constrictive GL. Quit wasting all of our time and yours for that matter.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom