Seems to me You nailed it. I don't get why some SWA folks don't seem to understand that it makes total sense if a F9 pilot would rather continue flying an Airbus in DEN rather than commute to a SWA base and perhaps never get back to DEN. Just because SWA currently has a higher pay rate doesn't mean they are a "better" job. For many, living were you want and doing the kind of flying you want far surpasses a higher wage. You would think the SWA pilots of anyone would understand someone wanting to make their own airline successful in the future. F9 could easily be going great a few years from now. If they get an owner who can realize it's potential the F9 guys will be very happy they didn't get dissolved and stapled to the bottom of SWA.
The SWA folks on here don't seem to understand that there is a lot more to life than flying for SWA. That's not a slam on SWA it's fine if someone wants to work there, but thinking everyone else should is a little narcissistic.
To be fair, during the hours' worth of negotiation, SWA offered three of the four things Frontier wanted: Pay protection, furlough protection, and domicile protection. The only one of the four not offered was seat protection. That means none of the Frontier guys would have had to commute back to Denver. They would have kept their base positions.
Also importantly, none of them would have gotten furloughed. None. Gary gave his word on that, and I'd go out on a limb and say that GK's word is worth a lot more than BB's word. Ask the Midwest Express pilots what they think of that. However, Frontier's negotiating committee went back and put out that word that SWA would have "furloughed the bottom 20% of F9," and was hailed as a hero for 'saving' the junior pilots. Patently false.
Regardless, they turned it down and ended up with Republic. That was their choice. As Dan mentioned, they didn't want to fly for SWA. Good for them, and good luck to them. I sincerely hope things work out for them, regardless of the SWA-Frontier acquisition failure.
Bubba