wms
billSquared
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2003
- Posts
- 2,052
I did my time with Uncle Sam and know about the "hassles" of serving. The difference is, in the military we had a support system that did just that, support us. We had the routine annoyances, but it wasn't a system designed to hamm-string us. The FFDO program on the other hand intentionally makes it difficult to do what they "hire" you to do. When they get sensible about it, I'll jump in.EagleRJ said:True- there are a lot of hassles associated with the program. The way I see it, all the hurdles the TSA has thrown up in front of the program won't stop pilots who want to have every possible resource to defend their aircraft. FFDOs have to put up with some hassles (and also receive some benefits) in the course of their duties, but it's an easy decision to make in my book.
Right now, there's an American on patrol in Fallujah who also has to go thorough a lot of hassles. He and every person who is actively participating in this war make sacrifices to some degree. Those sacrifices asked of FFDOs are minor in comparison, and they shouldn't stop anyone who wants to contribute to the security of the country.
As far as Tasers go. Terrorists work in teams. A taser is good for one shot at a time. You can't fire it at one guy after another. If you have one taser and five guys rush the cockpit, four are gonna get there. The fact that there is one on the plane is not a deterent, because the mission will still be completed. The fact that there may be guns on planes are a deterent. Not because the terrorist might die, because they don't care if they do, but because the mission might fail, and that is a fate worse than death.