acaTerry
SAPM
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2001
- Posts
- 2,393
This is going to sound really bad, but I don't mean it the way it comes out...really, NO OFFENSE to ramp workers and such.
You have to consider the data across the study. Consider jobs such as IT, law, etc that do not have a "lower portion" such as ramp personnel, assembly, to pull down the collective IQ. These types of job basically have a 95% acceptance rate of applicants, which allows some real rocks to get in there (see the ATL ASA ramp and tell me that we have professors working there). This means that many high-school and below educated people are working these positions, representing the unions.
Now that makes a significant difference. Take the collective average of these versus the postgraduate level of education that dominates the population of other fields, which are not represented by unions, and that puts a dent in the union's collective IQ. This does not mean that people who unionized are less intelligent. It simply means that book-smarts are less prevalent, and this is what is used as the "cognitive" yardstick. Remember that Albert Einstein was a dropout, and considered to be one of those "less cognizant" people.
Now does this mean that doctors, unionized through the AMA are of lower IQ because they are unionized? I think not.
In summary, this was not a valid study so I pay no attention to it. You can take your anti-union propoganda elsewhere. Nice try.
You have to consider the data across the study. Consider jobs such as IT, law, etc that do not have a "lower portion" such as ramp personnel, assembly, to pull down the collective IQ. These types of job basically have a 95% acceptance rate of applicants, which allows some real rocks to get in there (see the ATL ASA ramp and tell me that we have professors working there). This means that many high-school and below educated people are working these positions, representing the unions.
Now that makes a significant difference. Take the collective average of these versus the postgraduate level of education that dominates the population of other fields, which are not represented by unions, and that puts a dent in the union's collective IQ. This does not mean that people who unionized are less intelligent. It simply means that book-smarts are less prevalent, and this is what is used as the "cognitive" yardstick. Remember that Albert Einstein was a dropout, and considered to be one of those "less cognizant" people.
Now does this mean that doctors, unionized through the AMA are of lower IQ because they are unionized? I think not.
In summary, this was not a valid study so I pay no attention to it. You can take your anti-union propoganda elsewhere. Nice try.