Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Sterile Cockpit over the Hudson

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

buscap

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Posts
999
And did anyone else notice Captain SULLY fessed up to busting sterile cockpit, with his comment about how nice the Hudson looked?

Funny how the talking heads in congress have not called for his liver on a plate.

Oh well...where's my beer......???

(yes...I know this is a lame thread)
 
lets see Sully successfully pulls off in the real airplane what nobody can replicate in the sim, nobody dies, he is a hero, and somebody on flightinfo wants to point out how he "busted" sterile cockpit by saying the river was pretty
 
...and why is this in the "Regional" forum?
 
lets see Sully successfully pulls off in the real airplane what nobody can replicate in the sim, nobody dies, he is a hero, and somebody on flightinfo wants to point out how he "busted" sterile cockpit by saying the river was pretty

Your confusing Sully with the United Sioux City crew. Pilots have been put in the sim to replicate Sullys senario and the majority of pilots successfully accomplished the same thing. Also, did you notice that Sully hit the water (according to the papers so take this with a grain of salt) nearly 3 times harder then the airbus was designed to hit in a ditching senario. In his defense here, however, most pilots could not ditch within the design limits airbus had built in. Of course who can blame them? Who gets to practice ditching in the sim?
But buscap is correct. Sully violated sterile cockpit. If he had been flying a CRJ the feds would probably be saying that if he hadn't been casually chatting beneath 10,000 then maybe he could have seen and avoided the giant flock of geese.

F*** it!
 
Because the OP is making a point about the double standard applied to the Colgan accident crew, a regional airline.
 
Sully made one small comment on the order of stuff said by every crew in every airplane across the country.

Regional airline crews, such as Colgan or Comair in LEX, have at times shown a completely awe-inspiring lack of regard for sterile cockpit and its importance. So bad that it makes my head spin.
 
Regional airline crews, such as Colgan or Comair in LEX, have at times shown a completely awe-inspiring lack of regard for sterile cockpit and its importance. So bad that it makes my head spin.

You mean like these legacy pilots?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmCtJhCPEeQ

http://www.airdisaster.com/special/special-dl1141.shtml

http://www.tailstrike.com/310888.htm

I believe these guys got faulted for sterile cockpit as well;

http://www.ntsb.gov/NTSB/brief.asp?ev_id=20001208X05238&key=1


I believe it was in this one too;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northwest_Airlines_Flight_255

http://www.ntsb.gov/NTSB/brief.asp?ev_id=20001213X31759&key=1
 

Latest resources

Back
Top