Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Southwest the new "Legacy" carrier?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

daviator

Well-known member
Joined
May 31, 2002
Posts
46
A New Chapter In US Airline Evolution... Really.

This morning, United Airlines is announcing that they will be entering the Sarasota-Chicago market with 737-800 nonstops to its hub at O'Hare. On first pass, great. Congratulate SRQ and move on.

On the other hand, don't move on. Take a hard look at what this represents.

It's a first - United is jumping into a market (SRQ-Chicago) that Southwest is abandoning

It's more than just a new route. It's a bombshell indication of an emerging paradigm in the economics of air service. It's likely that this is the first time that a legacy carrier has entered a substantial market abandoned by an LCC.

And it wasn't dropped by Southwest because of lack of traffic - but, according to WN, because of the carrier's operational costs. They are in business to make money, and they make business decisions accordingly. It's the main reason that Southwest has prospered for over 40 years. No point in staying at a destination that can't generate dollars to their bottom line.

Background: A New Competitive Paradigm: The LCC "Advantage" Illusory? The accepted lore is that LCCs are using their alleged cost advantages to blow legacy carriers out of markets left and right. The only problem with that fantasy is that the "LCC cost advantage" is often a figment of imagination on the part of financial analysts who wouldn't know a 737 from a vacuum cleaner.

Last month, Southwest Airlines advised Sarasota-Bradenton International Airport that, as part of its merger process with AirTran, it would pull out of the SRQ market in August.

The service being eliminated isn't just some one-flight-per-day drop in the bucket. It encompasses approximately 370,000 annual passengers generating over $47.3 million in revenues. This includes nearly 120,000 local O&D passengers that AirTran is carrying annually to Chicago/MDW, with average load factors in the 80% range, and all-up passenger revenue yields somewhere near 14.5 cents.

But even though MDW is one of Southwest's largest operations, with the potential for significant additional connecting feed traffic on the SRQ-MDW segment, the airline advised that the decision to drop SRQ wasn't even close - the loss factor was, according to WN, clear, unambiguous, and unsustainable with Southwest's cost structure and operating model.

So, Southwest is leaving. And United is moving to replace the gap left in Chicago service. In addition, Delta is also seeing potential in a post-AirTran/Southwest SRQ, too. They just filed schedules for nonstops to LGA. As did JetBlue.

Ponder the implications. It's a new set of competitive economics in the air service business.
 
Probably because SW already flies non stops to TPA and RSW through MCO. Just a guess.
It is as if the article was writtten by some freshman in Compostion 101. I give it a D-. It's stupid and has no facts other than a bunch of blah blah legacy blah blah blah.
 
Last edited:
The missing component in this "article" are the CASM's for each carrier.

The data I have from 2010 has UAL at a higher CASM than SWA.

Anyone have more recent CASM data, hopefully for a UAL 737-800?
 
I wouldn't necessarily say United will lose money.

One of the major reasons SWA purchased us (AirTran) was to eliminate a competitor who was undercutting their fares by 10-15% in similar markets. Once DOCC happened, our fares increased to match almost across the board... and people paid them.

Now with the withdrawal from SRQ, with little competition, UAL will be free to come in with fares 50% higher or double what SWA was charging and if people don't want to drive a couple hours to another city each way plus pay for parking for however long they're gone, they'll pony up because they don't have a choice.

However, I agree that the news article isn't exceptionally insightful... The only news is that one airline abandoned a money-losing station and another airline is coming in to see if they can profit from it. It's what airlines do every day... Sophomoric writing, at best.
 
SWA will continue to prune the new route structure to allow the stronger routes to grow (ie. be more profitable). Considering the overlap between TPA/SRQ and PIE, you can't be surprised by the move. Allegiant has decent network out of PIE. I am more interested in seeing what is done with MKE. That was AT's last turf battleground. The intent was to attract N. Chicago traffic and blow NWA and MidEx away. We put some money into the move (a rare feat for AT) and we were actually successful. The terminal and gates that AT operates from in MKE are also the nicest/newest. If SWA draws MKE down it won't be a flippant or slam dunk decision.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top