HowardBorden
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2013
- Posts
- 889
On the parts in bold I completely agree. We have fundamentally changed our list. There is certainly a portion of our original list that are yes voters no matter what, the reasons are varied from; I don't have a lot of time left and I'll agree to any small improvement in order to get mine before I retire, to those that want to never be confrontational in order to preserve the era of a "constructive relationship" with management.Thanks for that. I am going off thread topic here but I am really more interested in your current section 6. How are negotiations going? You've been at it for 2-3 years? Close to end game? Management playing hard ball? Pilots satisfied with pace of negotiations? At my own carrier we are not at all happy with negotiations and especially management's stance on several key issues. Been at it for over three years. Things starting to heat up as pilots' patience is at an end. Wish the best for you guys but I think that SWAPA will have to experience a real sea change to get any traction. Perhaps this is where the "disgruntled" AT pilots may be a real asset in your struggle to improve your CBA. You are probably going to have to inflict some "pain" on SWA before you get any positive movement. That's something I don't think SWAPA knows how to do. Regards,
Fr8doggie
Those recently added will easily drown out the automatic yes votes. I think most former AT folks will not be easily swayed to a yes vote on practically anything. Management will take a while to understand how the recent additions to the list will change the dynamics of negotiations, but in time it will become evident.