Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Southwest Line on Credit?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Dicko-
You deny that AT had a 500 TPIC requirement in 2004?
That could be waived if so desired?

I don't doubt that you had some older pilots in the mix- so many pilots were laid off after 9/11- pilots landed at just about every airline- even regionals-
But again, there is no question that the SWA and AT jobs were not remotely equal at any time before the merger.
Are you questioning that assertion? By what metric are you measuring your equality? We had 2 pilots leave widebody FO slots at delta to come here in my class.

I'm willing to hear your argument though-


I'm not asserting our equality, I'm asserting our superiority. SWA also had numerous pilots leave for other airlines. My sim partner for upgrade was a DAL 767 Captain. Your point is moot, mute and most importantly .... Moo.

The number was 500 121 TPIC. It was waived for a small number of Mil pilots, experienced corporate, Heavy (747 F.Os) and of course a tiny percentage of special people. The competitive number was at least 1000 121 TPIC.

Ask somebody about the comparative unstable approach data between SWA and AirTran. SWA has quadruple the number on a relative scale. Any perceived superiority of SWA pilots is a greater myth than 'The Golden Rule'.

Your FOQA numbers would make a webbed foot Flemish whore blush.
 
Dicko, now your just being a troll.

It was always a better job. Period. And now I yawn, bc I'm bored- you've apparently decided you're better than all your new coworkers and clearly all swapa pilots should've been stapled... Whatever. It's your blood pressure.

AT is done. Im just saying that if we buy anybody else, expect the junior FOs here to be a LOT more militant in the SLI. There wont be support for anywhere near as good a deal as AT got
 
The competitive number was at least 1000 121 TPIC.


That was your competitive?

Not even close to competitive at Southwest, thanks for helping prove the point though.


And the fact that you are now trying to throw out 'unstable approaches' as your new critera makes the whole conversation even more lame.

How many apps did Airtran have on file from Southwest guys Dicko?
 
If it was about buying a job. Another guy that sucked on the Government titty... calling me out. Funny. I got my type on the GI Bill - FYI! :beer:
No, I'm calling you out because of your keyboard warrior tactics!;)
 
Competitive SWA applicants carried 3000-2500PIC/turbine/4yr degree.

Unstable approach dig, lets talk about that, there is a reason: differences in flight operations.
 
That was your competitive?

Not even close to competitive at Southwest, thanks for helping prove the point though.


And the fact that you are now trying to throw out 'unstable approaches' as your new critera makes the whole conversation even more lame.

How many apps did Airtran have on file from Southwest guys Dicko?

I don't know Red. Why don't you make up a number and tell me :D While you're at it; tell me how many SWA pilots have apps at United, Delta, and FedEx. Today's winners are tomorrows losers. United pilots have been a little quieter over the last decade haven't they ..... Hmmmm ? I see you haven't applied lesson to your own hubris yet.

The next two years should be interesting. We'll see numerous FOs from both sides go to the above mentioned if they're able. You'll need to have re-alter your paradigm ...... Again.

One of ours left this week for US Air. How does that fit into your 'SWA is the better airline' argument ?
 
Competitive SWA applicants carried 3000-2500PIC/turbine/4yr degree.

Unstable approach dig, lets talk about that, there is a reason: differences in flight operations.

I agree. 1000 121 TPIC was a minimum. My class had all of the above. It's standard and isn't exactly Everest.

Tell me about the different flight ops please ? Are you saying that a smaller airport makes it more difficult to be stable ? Midway perhaps ? Either argument is a complete cop out.
 
Dicko, now your just being a troll.

It was always a better job. Period. And now I yawn, bc I'm bored- you've apparently decided you're better than all your new coworkers and clearly all swapa pilots should've been stapled... Whatever. It's your blood pressure.

AT is done. Im just saying that if we buy anybody else, expect the junior FOs here to be a LOT more militant in the SLI. There wont be support for anywhere near as good a deal as AT got


Damn. I was hoping that by not adding a smiley you'd overdose on Creatine at the gym and pop a blood vessel. :D

My tone was a wind up and I'm not really arrogant enough to believe that one pilot group is better than another. The other stuff is true. Glass houses chief.
 
I like this thread, everyone wants to be heard. Even when the discussion has been open for a long time, holding onto whatever grievances that is held within your mind and heart will only make you sick. No need to knock a brother down, being frustrated and treated poorly is no way to live. I wish the my company is better than yours wasn't a personal insult to those who feel like they are being attacked. For many it is, there is far too much emotions involved. From wherever you sat there is a turd potentially around the next corner.
 
I don't know Red. Why don't you make up a number and tell me :D While you're at it; tell me how many SWA pilots have apps at United, Delta, and FedEx. Today's winners are tomorrows losers. United pilots have been a little quieter over the last decade haven't they ..... Hmmmm ? I see you haven't applied lesson to your own hubris yet.

The next two years should be interesting. We'll see numerous FOs from both sides go to the above mentioned if they're able. You'll need to have re-alter your paradigm ...... Again.

One of ours left this week for US Air. How does that fit into your 'SWA is the better airline' argument ?

Just like I said earlier Dicko, if it is somebody's personal choice to go to Airtran (just like that guy going to USair), that's fine. Could be base related, family related, or maybe hoping for an earlier upgrade. All valid points. It's all about a personal choice. But don't try to come on here and act like SW and Airtran were equal when it came time to get a job.

I'm not saying our pilots are any better than any others, but when you try to say these two airlines were equals, then I'm going to call BS because it is.

Just because your pissed about losing your CA seat doesn't give you free rein to fabricate the facts. Sorry.
 
Ask somebody about the comparative unstable approach data between SWA and AirTran. SWA has quadruple the number on a relative scale. Any perceived superiority of SWA pilots is a greater myth than 'The Golden Rule'.

Your FOQA numbers would make a webbed foot Flemish whore blush.

Please show your work! Are you a FOQA gatekeeper at BOTH airlines? Where are you coming up with this data? Is it published somewhere? I've never seen FOQA data from multiple airlines published side by side ANYWHERE! If you have access to this data, please share it with the rest of us. Other than factual data to back up your assertions I will assume you are just making it up.
 
Well I'm not too senior, so me popping a blood vessel isn't going to do much good for most-
If you could get some of those junior capts and senior FOs to head on over to airways that would be much better
 
Ask somebody about the comparative unstable approach data between SWA and AirTran. SWA has quadruple the number on a relative scale. Any perceived superiority of SWA pilots is a greater myth than 'The Golden Rule'.

Your FOQA numbers would make a webbed foot Flemish whore blush.


SWA considers it an unstable approach if ur at 999 AGL. And not on speed And fully configured for landing

Hardly a safety issue. Just the way SWA wants there aircraft flown .
 
Here are some facts: At my time of hire at Airtran I had coworkers get hired by SW with the same experience, same age, etc as me. I went to Airtran and never updated my app, yet was called for an interview within a year, which I declined. SW was simply not that attractive to me, or many other pilots.
I am now placed next to former FOs and students of mine on the SL. One guy within 100 # of me was a former student and got his first commuter job after I was a Captain at AirTran.
 
Today's winners are tomorrows losers. United pilots have been a little quieter over the last decade haven't they ..... Hmmmm ?
I don't know if I would compare United 2000 and Southwest 2013. Southwest's current balance sheet is stronger than United's even in 2000 not to mention that Southwest has zero pension obligations to fund. I also doubt Gary Kelly will be giving the Southwest pilots a "home run" contract similar to United's 2000 contract. I see Gary Kelly and SWAPA agreeing to "doubles" over the next few contract cycles. Doubles can also produce runs and usually results in less strikeouts.

One of ours left this week for US Air. How does that fit into your 'SWA is the better airline' argument ?
Wow, a 39 year old 3rd year pay AirTran FO that lives in CLT left to go to USAirways. I had a new hire classmate of mine here at AirTran leave for Southwest 2 months before he would have upgraded (in our 30th month at AirTran). I also had a 13 year AirTran captain buddy of mine apply to SWA in the fall of 2008 because he was nervous about AirTran filing bankruptcy.

For the record, I never applied to Southwest (nor have a B737 type rating) but appreciate the Southwest's financial stability considering the risks that are out there in today's economy/central bank money printing frenzy (that could lead to energy price inflation).
 
I don't know if I would compare United 2000 and Southwest 2013. Southwest's current balance sheet is stronger than United's even in 2000 not to mention that Southwest has zero pension obligations to fund. I also doubt Gary Kelly will be giving the Southwest pilots a "home run" contract similar to United's 2000 contract. I see Gary Kelly and SWAPA agreeing to "doubles" over the next few contract cycles. Doubles can also produce runs and usually results in less strikeouts.

Wow, a 39 year old 3rd year pay AirTran FO that lives in CLT left to go to USAirways. I had a new hire classmate of mine here at AirTran leave for Southwest 2 months before he would have upgraded (in our 30th month at AirTran). I also had a 13 year AirTran captain buddy of mine apply to SWA in the fall of 2008 because he was nervous about AirTran filing bankruptcy.

For the record, I never applied to Southwest (nor have a B737 type rating) but appreciate the Southwest's financial stability considering the risks that are out there in today's economy/central bank money printing frenzy (that could lead to energy price inflation).


For the record max....... If SWA had a "Tokyo rose" at AT it would be YOU.
 
Here are some facts: At my time of hire at Airtran I had coworkers get hired by SW with the same experience, same age, etc as me. I went to Airtran and never updated my app, yet was called for an interview within a year, which I declined. SW was simply not that attractive to me, or many other pilots.
I am now placed next to former FOs and students of mine on the SL. One guy within 100 # of me was a former student and got his first commuter job after I was a Captain at AirTran.

And I'm sure there are some 20+ year retired Mil pilots originally hired at SWA slotted in behind you. what's your point?
 
I don't know if I would compare United 2000 and Southwest 2013. Southwest's current balance sheet is stronger than United's even in 2000 not to mention that Southwest has zero pension obligations to fund. I also doubt Gary Kelly will be giving the Southwest pilots a "home run" contract similar to United's 2000 contract. I see Gary Kelly and SWAPA agreeing to "doubles" over the next few contract cycles. Doubles can also produce runs and usually results in less strikeouts.

Wow, a 39 year old 3rd year pay AirTran FO that lives in CLT left to go to USAirways. I had a new hire classmate of mine here at AirTran leave for Southwest 2 months before he would have upgraded (in our 30th month at AirTran). I also had a 13 year AirTran captain buddy of mine apply to SWA in the fall of 2008 because he was nervous about AirTran filing bankruptcy.

For the record, I never applied to Southwest (nor have a B737 type rating) but appreciate the Southwest's financial stability considering the risks that are out there in today's economy/central bank money printing frenzy (that could lead to energy price inflation).

Go to bed Max. Nobody asked you if you applied at SWA, nor was the subject of the central bank or economy raised. Your opinion has become worthless on the subject of 'mergers' . Pizza parties perhaps, but not mergers.

You're a decent dude who was way out of his depth and outplayed. I'm hoping that the prevalent "Tokyo Rose" analogy isn't true.
 
So what's the deal over there-
Everybody at AT has to be pissed and feel like they got screwed or they'll be browbeaten into silence by the aggro crowd?
 
I don't know if I would compare United 2000 and Southwest 2013. Southwest's current balance sheet is stronger than United's even in 2000 not to mention that Southwest has zero pension obligations to fund.

You love to talk about the balance sheet and the lack of pension obligations, but you consistently ignore all of the other metrics important for judging the health of a company and its capacity for growth. Whether you look at operating margin, net margin, return on equity, return on assets, or virtually any other metric used to judge the effectiveness of management, SWA is performing atrociously, and has been for some time. Yes, SWA has plenty of money sitting around (by airline standards). But the problem is that management doesn't seem to have the slightest clue what to do with all of that cash to create shareholder value. Shareholders would be smarter to put their money in a CD rather than giving it to Gary to sit on for the next decade. And just as the shareholders get screwed by Gary's inability to produce value, so do the employees get screwed by career stagnation.
 
My point? I was responding to Wave et al that claim It took longer to get hired at SW and /or that we got too much in this deal. I simply gave some facts that may show their level of b.s. They think if they repeat it enough it will be true, but it is not.
Retired mil guy? He is on his second career and has benies and a pension, his level on the seniority list is hardly relevant.
 
Please show your work! Are you a FOQA gatekeeper at BOTH airlines? Where are you coming up with this data? Is it published somewhere? I've never seen FOQA data from multiple airlines published side by side ANYWHERE! If you have access to this data, please share it with the rest of us. Other than factual data to back up your assertions I will assume you are just making it up.

Are you even an airline pilot ? "Please share it with us ?" ..... If you're interested then I suggest you contact the gatekeepers or Flight Ops and find out for yourself.

Both airlines have access to each others FOQA data. Publish it on FI yourself. Farkin Muppet..
 
My friend from A/T was a two year captain when he decided to come to Southwest. It wasn't easy as he lived in ATL but after looking at all the advantages that SW had over AT it became an easy choice. Airtran pilots had about 400 applications on file or around a quarter of your pilot group all had apps in at SW prior to the purchase. NONE of the Southwest pilots had apps in at Airtran!

To all those at A/T that thought arbitration would have saved them from their horrible fate of being bought by one of the most successful airline companies in the world. It wouldn't have. Even the arbitrators in the dispute between the mechanics realized that the two were not equal careers. That is why the mechanics from A/T were made to give up anywhere from 2-3 years seniority to come over to the Southwest side.

In all honesty can you say with a straight face that Airtran formerly Value Jet was in even the same class as Southwest? How many books have been written about Airtran? How many college professors used airtran as examples of how to run a successful business? How many Business leaders tried to mimic Airtran to run their business successfully? Let me help you with those answers. NONE!

When you told people you worked for Airtran how many times did you have to explain who the hell Airtran was? Don't worry as a new Southwest purchase you will never have to do that again as most people will now smile at you and say how much they love Southwest.

Our contract was head and shoulders above yours prior to the merger and strike vote of 99%. It took over 30+ years to get that contract and to think that you can just walk in and enjoy the blood and sweat that went into getting where we are today just by saying Airtran was equal berates all those who stived to get us were we are today. I am not saying that someday Airtran wouldn't be where we are today but before Southwest bought Airtran it wasn't even close.
 
I was going to make a similar argument, and then I realized -A) it's long over.
And B) trying to convince 6 anonymous AT hard liners on FI is pretty pointless-

Just know C) if you're from another carrier and GK loses his mind again and decides to spend the profit of our collective efforts buying you, don't expect as good a deal as AT got.
 
In all honesty can you say with a straight face that Airtran formerly Value Jet was in even the same class as Southwest?

Nope. Our product was far superior.

How many books have been written about Airtran? How many college professors used airtran as examples of how to run a successful business? How many Business leaders tried to mimic Airtran to run their business successfully? Let me help you with those answers. NONE!

The Southwest that you describe is yesterday's news. No business leaders are trying to mimic SWA today. SWA is the poster child for failing to deliver shareholder value.

When you told people you worked for Airtran how many times did you have to explain who the hell Airtran was?

Never. The response was usually "Oh, I LOVE AirTran! I ride on you guys whenever I can!"

Don't worry as a new Southwest purchase you will never have to do that again as most people will now smile at you and say how much they love Southwest.

Actually, since the merger was announced, the typical comment from one of our customers has been "I'm sorry to see AirTran go. I'm going to have to start using Delta. Can't stand that no assigned seating thing on Southwest."
 
Everybody knows the following:
1) A great guy and a great pilot that interviewed and got hired at SWA.

2) A person who is personality challenged and aeronautically disfunctional who interview with SWA and got hired

3) A great guy and a great pilot who had all the tickets with all the type ratings who interviewed and did not get hired.

Since you work at SWA you are #1 or #2. You be the judge.

Guess what? You are just like every other airline. Every HR department has their nuances and quirks. Just because they told you that they hired "only the best" when you showed up to day 1 of initial training does not make it so. If you believed that line then you are probably leaning towards the #2 example above.

If you can look at yourself in the mirror and laugh at yourself then you have enough modesty to realize that SWA is not infallible. SWA needs to look at the procedures and practices and evolve into an airline that will continue to grow in technology and the aircraft they fly and the way that they operate.

If you continue to believe that you are the "best of the best" you will continue down the primrose path to your own destruction. Your choice.
 
Are you even an airline pilot ? "Please share it with us ?" ..... If you're interested then I suggest you contact the gatekeepers or Flight Ops and find out for yourself.

Both airlines have access to each others FOQA data. Publish it on FI yourself. Farkin Muppet..
What a joke! In other words, "I can't publish the data because I don't have it. I am simply making this stuff up as I go."
 
You love to talk about the balance sheet and the lack of pension obligations, but you consistently ignore all of the other metrics important for judging the health of a company and its capacity for growth. Whether you look at operating margin, net margin, return on equity, return on assets, or virtually any other metric used to judge the effectiveness of management, SWA is performing atrociously, and has been for some time. Yes, SWA has plenty of money sitting around (by airline standards). But the problem is that management doesn't seem to have the slightest clue what to do with all of that cash to create shareholder value. Shareholders would be smarter to put their money in a CD rather than giving it to Gary to sit on for the next decade. And just as the shareholders get screwed by Gary's inability to produce value, so do the employees get screwed by career stagnation.

He likes to talk about those things because they are true, much to your dismay.

I get that fact that you don't like Gary Kelly, but he's performing atrociously? That's pretty funny.

Let's see, he's continued with year over year profits. More than 40 of them if I'm not mistaken.

He has the cleaniest/strongest balance sheet among his peers, actually has for several years.

A company that owns out-right more than 2/3rds of their fleet. Unheard of in this industry.

Now let's turn an eye toward shareholder value...

He's pushing for 15% ROIC and Wall Street is paying attention. His initives are getting traction. Full 800's, adding more seats on the 700's, AAI transistion/codeshare, big addition of ancillary revenue (early boarding fees is off the chart), etc, etc.

My shareholder value is up over 50%. I think I've done slightly better than your idea of a CD, but that doesn't fit in well with your 'anti-GK' rhetoric. Don't let your BS actually get in the way of the facts.

I'm not going to sit here and bash the AAI product. It was a 'different' product than SW. Doesn't make it any better or any worse. And I agree that there were plenty that liked the Business Class. But that Business Class caused pain in the Coach class. Overall, it worked pretty well. Airtran just didn't have the cash on hand to take it to the next level. That's why the BOD pulled the parachute on the operation. Gary gave them a nice return on their investment as well, and if you were a large AAI shareholder you would have walked away with a nice premium on what was the current price.

I'm not saying Gary is perfect or hasn't made some bad choices, but I'm not sure what metric you are comparing his performance as a CEO. I would say he is above average in every regard. I'd put him in the top 5% of airline CEOs. You just don't like the fact that he bought your airline.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom