mushroom
It's pronounced Doo-MAH
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2005
- Posts
- 270
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I heard today this is being classed as an "Accident" and that the captain was a young guy. Too bad for him, now he will permanently have that stain on his records. Kiss goodbye any major airline job.
THIS is why you want to steer clear of any company who doesn't keep their acft in good MX condition.
If this accident happened due to a maintenance issue, then why would this blemish his record? I guess it could be a pain in the @ss to have to explain it. Even if it was his fault, it wouldn't necessarily preclude him from employment at major airlines.
I know a guy that ran an airplane off the end of a wet runway with a known tailwind and he was hired at UPS.
After your backpedal on the second post, I can see that you already decided that blaming this event on maintentance (based only on heresay) is unprofessional at best...I heard today this is being classed as an "Accident" and that the captain was a young guy. Too bad for him, now he will permanently have that stain on his records. Kiss goodbye any major airline job.
THIS is why you want to steer clear of any company who doesn't keep their acft in good MX condition.
After your backpedal on the second post, I can see that you already decided that blaming this event on maintentance (based only on heresay) is unprofessional at best...
As a crew member I am sounding off about how I feel about flying with MEL items that seem to never get fixed. If that is unprofessional, so be it.
Yeah, right... Sure you were.As a crew member I am sounding off about how I feel about flying with MEL items that seem to never get fixed. If that is unprofessional, so be it.
And maybe right now at UPS they wouldn't hire him. We really need to wait till the facts come out but from what I'm hearing, a contributing factor to this incident was the MX condition of the acft. If this is true, my POINT is that companies who continously allow their acft fly with multiple DMI's really need to re-think this practice. I'm not throwing stones at Southern Air in particular, but flying an acft with dmi stickers everywhere will eventually bite you in tha @ss. This is a perfect example.
Hiring standards at airlines change at the drop of a hat. I hope this doesn't hurt this kids future. My regards to the crew.
What would the internet be, without the Legions of "Know-It-Alls" with the time and motivation to lecture the rest of us how things really are, and how they should be...???This post is not intended to sling mud, but it's intent is to remember our roots as professional pilots and fly safe especially over the Holidays.
I'm getting real tired of you Cargo 360 guys taking your fustrations out on Southern. You need to get over what happened to your company, and get a clue.
Thanks
I know of a guy that did the same thing with a Westwind at Brenham, Texas. Had another six airplane crashes to his record and he has been at Continental Airlines now for years.If this accident happened due to a maintenance issue, then why would this blemish his record? I guess it could be a pain in the @ss to have to explain it. Even if it was his fault, it wouldn't necessarily preclude him from employment at major airlines.
I know a guy that ran an airplane off the end of a wet runway with a known tailwind and he was hired at UPS.
Fact is, that you came from a Air Force AMC background, and then moved into a civilian operation that only flew a handful of aircraft from the lower 48 to ANC, and then onto INC for one customer.Unsched ops in odd, exotic, hostile, and combat environments with no support is my backgroud, so please don't try to downplay my experience.
Here's the truth, the problem at Southern isn't safety, it's support. I'm not dealing with safety issues (if one comes up, the plane gets parked). I'm dealing with issues related to flying into the places we fly. New destinations, in different countries, on unfamiliar routes, without on-site personnel...
But guess what, that's my job.
Support is part of safety.
As a professional pilot that is exactly your job to plan ahead (airport study, route study, make phone calls ahead of time, coordinate, etc) when you go to new places, but I guess you know that with your "wealth" of ACMI ops. If your company is not providing you the means to do some of these things or the proper support then that is UNSAT. No sugarcoat, no weaseling around it, no excuses. Like I stated earlier a well runned outfit provides it's employers with the tools after that the employer provides his/her techinical expertise.
Fact is, that you came from a Air Force AMC background, and then moved into a civilian operation that only flew a handful of aircraft from the lower 48 to ANC, and then onto INC for one customer.
So you really don't have a good grasp of what the ACMI world is about... Only enough to make you think you do.
You need to understand that what you did in the Air Force (with the taxpayers paying for everything), or what you experienced with a small start-up company (that flew to one of the easist places in Asia to operate), does not give you the right to lecture anyone about the level of captain authority, safety practices, or operational procedures of an style of operation that you know little about.
I guess we come from different backgrounds, where having been at five airlines, through three bankruptcies, and survived three furloughs (including the last from a Major)... I tend to have less of a need for TLC than you seem to demand.
That's fine, as there is a job out there for everyone, and many outfits will provide just the kind of stable, easy, and comfortable existence than you obviously prefer... While other places, like Southern, will change daily, test your patience, and challenge you on a variety of levels everytime you come on duty. I could bid our Korean or domestic lines if I wanted to, but I find those trips kinda boring.
And that's "ok", because much like your choice to walk into your local Air Force Recruitment Office, (when I chose the USMC recruitment office instead) many years ago... It is a matter of personal preference as to what kind of place you work at.
You chose to work for Cargo 360. You were given the chance to work for Southern, and decided against it, you moved on to work elsewhere... It's all good.
But when you, or anyone else makes a direct, or indirect assertion that Southern is unsafe, unprofessional, or dangerous without any proof that is unacceptable.
You don't know what happened in Cairo, and neither did Dutch. You had no more right to use this event to lecture anyone about captain's authority or safety, than to tie it in with global warming or the genocide in Darfur.
But you did.
Which came across as very insulting to those of us that work hard to keep Southern not just flying, but in a safe and professional manner.
This is not a sports forum, where you can smack talk all day without care. (BTW, the Steelers suck)... It is a vehicle to pass along information about aviation operations, that people use to form opinions of and about those places (and just as importantly the people that work there).
So yeah, Southern's not your cup of tea (nor many other pilot's). But that does not mean it is not for everyone... (much like your choosing the Chair Force over the Corps).
But if all you have to say is based upon heresay, then don't bother (esp. if it is negative). If you still feel the need to lecture everyone upon safety and Captain Authority, or even global warming... Then feel free to start another thread elsewhere.
If you have something to add, feel free, but if all you want to do is subtract, then you are only doing more damage than good.
Nuff said.