L'il J.Seinfeld said:
Mega,
Don't leave this place on my account. I do caution people to keep thier IDs private though. I posted a few bits of info and evidently Browntail has nothing better to do then search through hundreds of posts.
Flyboy/Browntail/Rhoid
Get a freakin life. The fact is more IPAers agree with my opinion than yours. You can hurl all the juvenile personal insults you want but the fact remains this TA will pass. How can you call me selfish for voting yes rather than holding out for more? Given the state of the profession I think this is a good, albeit not great, deal. Seems to me your greed has blinded you to the current state of being a professional commercial pilot. Stop the and quit bieng a dikc.
Hey Lil J. Whine whine whine.
Here is a little TA education posted on the B&G
Examples of concessionary
-Pay: A 9% pay raise at the amendable date while the Company has doubled
it's net profits over the last decade. 9% is too low!
-Signing bonus versus full retro: Signing bonus fair for some, unfair to
others, full retro fair to all.
-ANC domicile: IPA having no input and not getting nothing for it.
-X domicile RSV utilization.
-No premium percentage (125%) for bidline credit over guarantee.
-Summer Vacation allotments from 10% to 8%.
-Expanded window to restore credit lost due to conflicts.
-Ability to sit hot in more than 1 gateway.
-3 hour pay penalty for CMLing on Monday instead of Sunday.
-Allowing for withholding of flying for IOE for a new fleet type for up to 1
year instead of displacing.
-Allowing the Company to change RSV times with a 1 bid period notice.
-Excessive extended DH up to 19 hours.
-Double crewing consisting of 1 Capt and 3 FOs.
-IROs for aircraft over 300,000 lbs.
-Open time ban as a contract violation.
-FAT calls leading to disciplinary action at the Company discretion.
-New "C" RSV type that covers the entire night time sort.
-A plan still at 1%
-Scope language with little enforcement possibilities. (That is if anyone
really understands what the scope language means.)
-J/S Matrix versus expanded CML TX (internationally.)
-Not resolving the 2 hostages by
making them whole BEFORE agreeing to any T/A.
-Language that includes "at the Company discretion."
-You could drive a sleeper team truck through the holes within this T/A.
There are others items too, but now you know why I see this T/A as
"concessionary." With many of those items I listed we could of made a stand
and said "NO" we will not give on this. In fact, I can not see in any area
where we did just that. The question is, did we receive enough in gains to
allow for such give-backs. The answer from most is no, and yet some are
still going to vote YES. It is beyond me why.
Lack of Unity breeds individualism and that hampers the ability to achieve our collective goals. We need to get back to the membership making decisions that are in the best interest of the group as a whole and not for what's just good for them individually. That is what Unity is all about and that means we may need to sacrifice what's good for me. Mutual respect for each other and a team concept will bring Unity and it is all based on emotion.
You get it you selfish ! You'll soon be based in ANC anyway you shmuck!!!