When my wife gets in a crappy mood, she gets on Facebook and starts firing EVERYBODY up. My point is, if Sokol originally told Berkshire that he had already purchased shares, there is absolutely NO ethical lapse, not even an appearance of one. If he didn't tell them originally, there was a lapse. Cheers!
It is fine to have this view, but I believe that one would be ignoring the true spirit of how one should conduct themselves in this situation. He should have sold the stock prior to informing WB about the company and the opportunities that may exist for BH.
Sokol said on CNBC he regrets ever mentioning the company to WB. He pushed the envelope too far and lost his job because of it. Was it worth the $3 million?... I don't think so.
Ethical, legal, or whatever, I doubt many people, who consider themselves ethical, would attempt this maneuver in the future.