dispatchguy
Dad is my favorite title
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2001
- Posts
- 1,569
Who wants to shoot the Canadians for their completely unprepared and uncoordinated trial for No-NAR eastbound NATs that they threw up on 1 OCT?
I loved the fact that on 1 OCT, when the new NAT track advisory came out, that the BOS ARTCC TMU folks had no clue that it was coming.
I loved the fact that on yesterday's Canadian conference call there was no clue how they were going to actually implement, and what kinds of procedures were required to make this thing work.
I loved that when the BOS track transition advisory finally came out, they did the things that they said they werent going to do on the conference call.
Today should be really interesting, in that today allegedly BOS will publish routes only to their common boundary between them and Moncton. Some flight planning systems cant handle No-NAR routings....
I'm all for efficiency and fuel savings, BUT, how about a little pre-coordination? Nothing like making crap up as we go along....
I loved the fact that on 1 OCT, when the new NAT track advisory came out, that the BOS ARTCC TMU folks had no clue that it was coming.
I loved the fact that on yesterday's Canadian conference call there was no clue how they were going to actually implement, and what kinds of procedures were required to make this thing work.
I loved that when the BOS track transition advisory finally came out, they did the things that they said they werent going to do on the conference call.
Today should be really interesting, in that today allegedly BOS will publish routes only to their common boundary between them and Moncton. Some flight planning systems cant handle No-NAR routings....
I'm all for efficiency and fuel savings, BUT, how about a little pre-coordination? Nothing like making crap up as we go along....
Last edited: