grog_sit_reserv
Crashcave Lounger
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2003
- Posts
- 1,070
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Longer fences is fine, but the AAA MEC is yelling about the outrageous placement of the F'd guys below Dave and are exploring options to decert ALPA.
What is the AAA position. If AWA agreed to longer fences would that stop this?
Anyways, as to the original question, dunno. Heard many different things thrown out there. I guess the best one I've heard is put fences in the contract. On both sides. When Mr. Odell upgrades, they come down around phx/las. When arbitrary guy on the east upgrades, they come down on the east side. So then you have both sides benefiting from the future retirements they brought to the table, and each side gets what they would have gotten, given both sides stayed static and operating in their own right. Get a decent contract, and any growth is fair game for either side.
Guys, I know its final. But the East wants to sink the company and put 35,000+ people out of work. ALPA won't lift a finger on this, I agree; but Parker might be worried that this will destroy all the progress USAir has made financially. He might be trying to find a way to mediate the agreement beyond the aribiter's decision.
So, what to do?
Why do you think Parker's looking for another merger partner. Another certificate?(wink wink) Bye bye US Airways.
Guys, I know its final. But the East wants to sink the company and put 35,000+ people out of work. ALPA won't lift a finger on this, I agree; but Parker might be worried that this will destroy all the progress USAir has made financially. He might be trying to find a way to mediate the agreement beyond the aribiter's decision.
So, what to do?
. If you're talking about adding fences to the joint contract that's fine, as long as it's an addition to the arbitration and does not contradict it.