easy spirit
Active member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2003
- Posts
- 40
Caveman,
I respectly disagree with your logic. Your logic says that SkyWest must risk a strike in order to raise the bar for ourselves and everyone else, and if the threat of a strike is not there, then we are just "freeloaders".
Well, I say to you this is not true. Allthough we are all pilots, we are not a "brotherhood" looking out for each other. The harsh reality of all this is that this is a business. And business is business. We are competitors, and what is good for Comair, Horizon, Chautauqua, etc. may not be good for SkyWest. When you guys at Comair were on strike, you were on strike TO BETTER YOUR OWN CONDITIONS, not for the betterment of others (competitors) conditions. If you were, have your heads examined.
I believe our 70 for 50 seat pay passed only because it is an 18 month agreement, and by the conclusion of the agreement, there would only be a small hand full of 70 seaters on the property. It was a bone thrown to mgt. from the pilots. Unfortunately you and others view this as our "continued unwillingness to improve things and carry our fair share of the load".
I can guarantee you that we will not sit idly by and see what is around before the end of this agreement to "see what we can get". We will seek meaningful improvements and we will expect nothing less from this profitable corporation. And when this happens, you and the others will view this as "raising the bar for everyone", when in reality we are just doing what is right for SkyWest.
Don't worry and lose any sleep about what were doing here at SkyWest, and (trust me), we won't worry about what you or anybody else is doing. It's just business!
I respectly disagree with your logic. Your logic says that SkyWest must risk a strike in order to raise the bar for ourselves and everyone else, and if the threat of a strike is not there, then we are just "freeloaders".
Well, I say to you this is not true. Allthough we are all pilots, we are not a "brotherhood" looking out for each other. The harsh reality of all this is that this is a business. And business is business. We are competitors, and what is good for Comair, Horizon, Chautauqua, etc. may not be good for SkyWest. When you guys at Comair were on strike, you were on strike TO BETTER YOUR OWN CONDITIONS, not for the betterment of others (competitors) conditions. If you were, have your heads examined.
I believe our 70 for 50 seat pay passed only because it is an 18 month agreement, and by the conclusion of the agreement, there would only be a small hand full of 70 seaters on the property. It was a bone thrown to mgt. from the pilots. Unfortunately you and others view this as our "continued unwillingness to improve things and carry our fair share of the load".
I can guarantee you that we will not sit idly by and see what is around before the end of this agreement to "see what we can get". We will seek meaningful improvements and we will expect nothing less from this profitable corporation. And when this happens, you and the others will view this as "raising the bar for everyone", when in reality we are just doing what is right for SkyWest.
Don't worry and lose any sleep about what were doing here at SkyWest, and (trust me), we won't worry about what you or anybody else is doing. It's just business!