ReverseSensing
On the BC
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2004
- Posts
- 1,452
theo said:The above quote about the first thread is the crux of my problem with union representation. The first thing to happen is a poisoning of the relationship with the company. If pilots don't feel resentment,fear, hate, disrespect, insecurity etc, then what do they need a union for. Unions like any other money making venture know that in order to convince people to pay for their services they must create demand. They do that by fostering all of the above emotions I mentioned above.
So at Skywest you don't get the feeling that any of those emotions are true. Skywest treats their employees fairly. People are fighting to get in there. People talk about how much they love it there. You don't see the preponderance of hate and discontent most other Union carriers contend with at Skywest. I just don't see where a union will make life better than it is. I do see them making it worse.
I think eventually you will see middle managers prefer to work with a pilot group under a CBA. It keeps them from having to make any difficult moral decisions. It keeps them from having to decide what the "right thing" is to do. They just do what the CBA says, and punch out at 5:00 p.m. That's why it is so important that the CBA spells out precisely how management will act in every conceiveable situation, because once the CBA is in effect, they cannot be trusted to do the right thing in an area of ambiguity, they will simply interpret the CBA to their (the company's) advantage and tell the pilot to pound sand and/or grieve it.
The difference between how management acts with or without a CBA is that without a CBA you ultimately have no protection against arbitrary and capricious actions of management except what you can personally bring to the table. With a CBA, you have the legal protection of the union against someone in management (however unlikely it might be) gunning for you.