Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
EX_CV580FR8Dawg said:MINISTRY.....A Mind Is A Terrible Thing To Taste...I thought it tasted like chicken...thats not terrible
metalflyboy said:The Skyway intranet site
what skyway intranet site?
meatwallet said:Is this true: Comair 3/21 class for the 328jet ??
No jets for YX for sure??
T-prop said:Has anyone been recalled from the furloughed 1900 class??
fam62c said:It seems to me that in the current environment of high fuel prices and revenue decline that Delta might actually be better off financially to just pay the leases on the 328's and let them sit instead of having anyone fly them. Here's what I mean: If DAL makes a deal with Skyway they will need to sign a typical code-share agreement that will guarantee Skyway a profit to provide the service. DAL takes all of the fiancial risk and Skyway is guaranteed a profit. With a deal like this DAL is not only paying for the aircraft leases but they will paying for EVERYTHING that Skyway needs to run the operation plus a profit for Skyway on top of it. In order for DAL to make a profit off of this they need to hope that after they pay off Skyway each month there is enough revenue left over for DAL to profit on the deal. What are the odds of this in the current cost/fare environment? The next question is whether or not there will even be enough revenue to make the Skyway deal less of a loss for DAL than simply letting the 328's sit and rot. Also, it's been a long time since ACA was operating this service so all of the gaps in the DAL express schedule are already filled. It would have made sense to make a seamless transition from ACA to Skyway but what sense does it make now? Why does DAL Express really need an additional partner with 32 seat jets that offer little flexibility due to limited seating and range? DAL Express doesn't even want more 50 seaters, they want 70 seaters, why would they want 32 seaters? Where are the profitible routes that are just sitting there waiting for 328Jet service?
In the end this will be an accounting decision: Is it better to blow $X each month on the 328 leases or to blow $X+ dollars each month on the Skyway deal and hope to get enough revenue to reduce the total loss to $X-? Maybe Skyway would be best to concentrate on growing it's Midwest Connect operation (one of the only regionals that has actually gotten smaller since 9-11) instead of sitting around endlessly waiting for DAL to decide their future.
Darn deregulationDonsa320 said:Next, the small jets get bigger to lower the seat mile costs and the small towns suffer a loss of service again because they are to small to support the bigger jets. Arg!
I am now standing by for incoming. <vbg>
~DC
Donsa320 said:You know, I think you could ask that question about every commuter in the fee for departure scheme. For example; Comair seems to be "profitable" but Mother Delta bleeds cash. A Northwest commuter lands here in MKE on a FRIDAY night and has only EIGHT passengers on a LGA/MKE segment. Lordy, what a profit margin that would have to have to make anything for NWA. Since the mainline fares are so low, one cannot say that the "trunk" fares can subsidize the feed as they did years ago. It does not appear that there are anywhere near enough dollars in the mainline fares for that anymore.
So what you say about the D-328's may be true. I'll be darned if I can figure out how any fee for departure operation is worth it. And at 15cents a seat mile cost, commuter jets are hard pressed to make a dime on their own. Witness Independence.
Next, the small jets get bigger to lower the seat mile costs and the small towns suffer a loss of service again because they are to small to support the bigger jets. Arg!
I am now standing by for incoming. <vbg>
~DC