I honestly don't know of anyone here making that much. Now your turn.
I honestly do.
Ask around
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I honestly don't know of anyone here making that much. Now your turn.
I honestly do.
Ask around
Sounds good to me.
You already have a concessionary contract that you agreed to, Steven. You have a captain that made $300 thousand last year because of it. Great for him, but very unreasonable.
Seriously, $300,000 for real? How is that even possible??
Just to be clear, I'm ok with those aircraft being parked.
Of course you are. You're a senior lifer.
You'd have to ask Steven, I don't follow their contract, but it has something to do with being able to drop trips and pick up premium open time trips at 200%.
Concessionary my ass.
Thank you for your affirmation of our pilot contract, Mr. Dispatcher.
Of course you are. You're a senior lifer.
You're welcome. When most employee groups are getting nothing, and some are even being asked for paycuts, I just want to know what makes the XJT pilots more special than the rest.
But when these a/c are parked SKYW INC can do a new cpa for flying at SKYW or ASA. Also those approx 200 pilots...what do you think will happen to the flying they were doing. Yep, ASA to cover.
Nothing makes us more special. My only point is that it doesn't make sense to agree to a concession when we don't have to. We are not at will employees like you guys are so they can't just "ask" for pay cuts. But thanks again Mr. Dispatcher for injecting yourself into a conversation about XJT pilots' contract.
I've been here 7 years and not planning on being a lifer. But my point being is that those aircraft leaving when their 15 and 15.5 year leases expire were part of the original CPA CAL wrote when they spun off COEX in 2002, it was part of the amended CPA in 2008, and part of the new CPA in 2010 when Skywest bought us. In all cases, we've known those aircraft will leave when their leases begin to expire next year. It would be true if Skywest wouldn't have bought us. Hence why I said it was status quo.
This proves your ignorance. We haven't had 200% in about a year. And when we did have it, it was very sporadic. And not one person can monopolize it anyway.
Our contract is concessionary in that LOA 9 was ratified with a 6.87% pay cut on all pay rates. We did get a couple of improved contract language but it wasn't monetary.
All I said was, "sounds good to me." Please keep your current contract, but why just for five years? Let's shoot for 10 or 20. You guys continue to lose money and the attrition will take care of everything else. Win/win for all of us.
All I said was, "sounds good to me." Please keep your current contract, but why just for five years? Let's shoot for 10 or 20. You guys continue to lose money and the attrition will take care of everything else. Win/win for all of us.
It doesn't prove ignorance, naivety of your contract maybe, but the fact of the matter remains; guys are unreasobable dicks.
And all I said is thanks to a dispatcher interjecting himself in a conversation about some other airline's pilot contract. Why five years? Well maybe if you didn't interject yourself into a conversation with a LASA pilot, you would know they negotiated for five years and worked under their old contract before ratifying their current one. But I'm sure as a non-union dispatcher of a different airline, you would know about the RLA and the realities of it.
I ask again then and maybe you can actually answer the simple question this time. Why should we agree to a contract that is concessionary instead of operating under our current one?
Simple really, but I couldnt do so without divulging company information on a public forum and I'm not going to do that. Any SkyWest or ExpressJet employee can do the math themselves on their respective company websites under the financial bonus section. If you care enough to find out for yourself, go do the math.
Couple whatever you find with the fact that ASA had no problem making money before ExpressJet was bought, and the fact that ExpressJet was losing money for years before they were bought, and its easy to see that XJT is negatively affecting ASA's bottom line.
Dude, I know all about ASA and their 5 years of negotiations. What I'm saying is, let's up the bar and go for 10 years of negotiations. It seems to be in your nature at XJT to one up everyone else. This would be a good start.
And my group is also currently going through pay negotations. You just don't see us on here airing our dirty laundry about it.
Nothing on our side. But you fail to mention that the CPA that Skywest Inc agreed to when buying ASA is that after five years they would only be paid the second lowest block hour of all the DCI carriers. They were headed to dramatic revenue loss and XJT had a new CPA for 35 aircraft with UAL and in the middle of negotiating another one with US Airways before Skywest put a stop to that. Then XJT enters the picture at precisely that five year mark. BR himself espoused how they would save about $60 million per year in synergy and economies of scale by merging the two airlines. And by the way, the reason why XJT was losing money is because SKW low balled the 2008 CPA that XJT inherited because they were able to offer a lower cost to CAL after assuming we would take concessions of 16% to bring us to the average compensation of Skywest pilots. In short, it was SKW who negatively affected XJT's bottom line and now they are having to deal with it. They broke it and now bought it. Which is why you don't find much sympathy with Inc on the LXJT side.