Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SF Bay Area Pilots

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

need2AV8

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 27, 2001
Posts
81
I was noticing on the SF Bay area sectional that the 30mn Mode C veil of SFO Class B doesn't exactly line up with the outermost rings of Class B.

I assume (and you know what they say about assuming) that the central point to measure the Mode C veil is their radar facility & that the rings that deliniate Class B are centered around the VOR or Airport reference point.

Can anyone deny or confirm?
Thanks.
 
Artistic license

I don't have a really good answer for you but I think the designers of Class B airspace are allowed a little artistic license when they dream up the final shape and scale.

The mythical 'upside-down wedding cake' is just a theoretical starting point and then they design the actual dimensions to fit actual needs.

But, yeah, I think the 30nm ring is based on distance from the primary airport and it's ARP.
 
Havent seen the SFO Sectional or Class B chart in a while, but if memory serves, the sectors had reference to dme paired with one of ILS's ( 28?). Who knows if the 30nm veil corelates. For some reason I always tuned in the ILS when determining class B sectors. Lazy now, and always fly IFR.

Will check charts tomorrow.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top