Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Settle the Bet

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
jt8d is considered a jurboJET. The fan does not produce any appreciable thrust (5%?) compared to a turbofan. With the BR715 EPR is the primary control for the fadec, N1 is the reversion when sans computer.
 
DCitrus9 said:
jt8d is considered a jurboJET. The fan does not produce any appreciable thrust (5%?) compared to a turbofan. With the BR715 EPR is the primary control for the fadec, N1 is the reversion when sans computer.
Hmm... I don't think I've ever seen it called anything but a low bypass turbofan...

can you provide some sources?
 
How 'bout the JT9D Pratt & Whitney dual-spool \ axial flow \ high bypass Turbofan?

Fan produces 75% of the 52,000 lbs of thrust with a 5 to 1 bypass ratio.

...at least that's what somebody told me ;)
 
furloughfodder said:
How 'bout the JT9D Pratt & Whitney dual-spool \ axial flow \ high bypass Turbofan?

Fan produces 75% of the 52,000 lbs of thrust with a 5 to 1 bypass ratio.

...at least that's what somebody told me ;)
That's fine for a JT9D but we're talking about JT8D's :p
 
DCitrus9 said:
jt8d is considered a jurboJET.
By who? You?
DCitrus9 said:
The fan does not produce any appreciable thrust (5%?) compared to a turbofan.
The JT8D is a turbofan. The 1.7-to-1 ratio Torqued mentioned is about right.

Now if it had no fan at all, then you could consider it a jurbojet.

(You have actually flown the '9...right?)
 
OK, this is a neat discussion, let me try my question again:

Are there any turboFAN (I did say FAN and not JET) engines out there where the primary measure of power is EPR, other than the CF700?

I conclude that the JT8 is arguably a turbofan, so it would qualify, therefore do you set power on it primarily by EPR? I assume the JT8 is that ultra low bypass affair of a stovepipe slung under the wings of 737-100 & 200s.

It also appears that the BR715 has a FADEC that uses EPR to set power, so I would assume the BR710s on a GV would have the same.

Any others?
 
Last edited:
Doh!

Disregard, I was coming in broken and stupid!

Due to the late hour and several coors lights, my post is factually innaccurate regarding turbojet. I've been off of the 9 for a few years, and am simply too lazy to look it up.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top