Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Sense for those who have ears to hear

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Timebuilder said:



. He knows that Al Gore did not "win" anything; not the election, not any of the recounts, and not enough support from democrats to run again.

A bufoon.

Al Gore did invent the internet though.....
 
Dammit man

No applause for the SNL bit? C'mon...everybody smile now.

W:D
 
flyifrvfr said:
Al Gore did invent the internet though.....
and for that we are all grateful. However, here's the really important question. Didn't he also invent SPAM?? Seems like it, based on the number of emails in my in box
 
Re: Re: Sense for those who have ears to hear

Originally posted by Typhoon1244
I did vote for Al Gore, he did win, and I'll be dam_ed if all those things didn't come true.


I saw a great bumper sticker the other day...

Re-defeat Bush 2004
 
Here is a thought for you to consider. I have been told that any Democrat can still be nominated up to the Demoncratic National Convention. I'm not sure if this is true or not but lettuce consider it is true. With all of the protesting of the war and a whole lot of servicemen going AWOL, doesn't this open the door for a snake like Hilary Clinton to slither through.

With all of the negitive things being said about GW and Kerry, doesn't give Hilary the best chance to defeat GW in November.
I mean we have an incumbent who the servicemen are protesting against, go figure. And we have a former servicemen who allegedly plotted to kill members of Congress and protested the war in Nam. Hilary Clinton just might look have a good chance of pulling the wool over our eyes again. That's scary. Go GW!!!! GO !!!
 
lettuce consider it is true

Hey, you made a funny!



With all of the protesting of the war and a whole lot of servicemen going AWOL

A "whole lot" going AWOL?

Hillary's plan is to run in '08, unless her own sense of grandeur displaces her political wisdom. I don't think that's likely.
 
Let's not rule out Bill Clinton too. I think it would be priceless to see both Bushes go down to him.
 
Timebuilder, you're at it again.

You're certainly entitled to your opinion, but as usual you destroy all that credibility you build with real arguments (which, by the way, you really do) by finishing it all off with some rediculously partisan statement about how "a liberal" will always do this or that. Blind partisanism is ALWAYS a deterent to real progress. It's just plain unamerican.
 
Herman Bloom said:
Timebuilder, you're at it again.

You're certainly entitled to your opinion, but as usual you destroy all that credibility you build with real arguments (which, by the way, you really do) by finishing it all off with some rediculously partisan statement about how "a liberal" will always do this or that. Blind partisanism is ALWAYS a deterent to real progress. It's just plain unamerican.

And you also are entitled to your opinion. That IS American.

When I speak about what is part of the liberal tactic (some say "bag of tricks") since the 1960's, I refer to intimate, personal knowlege that I have to share. It isn't simply the observation of a partisan, as you are suggesting.

Rather than the oberservation of liberal tactics being a partisan act, it is an attempt to identify and clarify the dynamic of the discussion, how it is often muddied and obfuscated, by using my own experiences as a guide.

I often saw personal attacks being launched by liberals when I WAS one, as it was the easiest way to shift the argument from the issues to visceral reactions surrounding personalities and insults. Words like "your boy bush" rather than "our current president" are good examples of this attitude. It is juvenile AND liberal, with only a few exceptions in the media today, like Alan Colmes and Maura Liasson, who are mature enough and far enough from party politics to have a sensible, if frustrating, discussion of the issues. Even with Alan, you can tell he often doesn't fully believe what he is saying. That, in itself, says a great deal.
 
Last edited:
You're certainly entitled to your opinion, but as usual you destroy all that credibility you build with real arguments (which, by the way, you really do) by finishing it all off with some rediculously partisan statement about how "a liberal" will always do this or that. Blind partisanism is ALWAYS a deterent to real progress. It's just plain unamerican.

Satan, et al

He has no credibility nor any solid arguments when it comes to politics, I would not even waste your time on his posts. He basically brings his comical and pointless opinions that he have gotten from his own beliefs and desires of his "little world". Let the facts speak for themselves, this even makes him look more like a "clown". Liberal this, Clinton that, blah, blah, blah, it is all the same but when he has nothing else but garbage to spew onto this board that is all that is left for him. Just laugh as many do and move on.


3 5 0
 
Hello...not only did they affect a change using weapons of mass effect in spain, they were caught trying to get busy with a dirty bomb in England during the last few days.

Also today, the Germans released an alleged 9/11 mastermind peding trial for some other act of terrorism...seems like they didn't want their trains bombed by terrorists this summer either.
 
He has no credibility nor any solid arguments when it comes to politics, I would not even waste your time on his posts. He basically brings his comical and pointless opinions that he have gotten from his own beliefs and desires of his "little world". Let the facts speak for themselves, this even makes him look more like a "clown". Liberal this, Clinton that, blah, blah, blah, it is all the same but when he has nothing else but garbage to spew onto this board that is all that is left for him. Just laugh as many do and move on.

I'm impressed.

You have succeeded in validating everthing I said in a single paragraph, far more economically than I could have done.

Sometimes, I don't even imgine such a succinct example.
 
Last edited:
Timebuilder said:
Sometimes, I don't even imgine such as succinct example blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah

did you get a Webster at the last church raffle?

get a job, man
 
You're certainly entitled to your opinion, but as usual you destroy all that credibility you build with real arguments (which, by the way, you really do) by finishing it all off with some rediculously partisan statement about how "a liberal" will always do this or that. Blind partisanism is ALWAYS a deterent to real progress. It's just plain unamerican.
But liberals are fair game, their answer to non-existant crime with rifles was to ban lawful citizens from owning rifles that possess a detatchable magazine and more than one additional evil feature, such as a bayonet lug, pistol grip, flash hider, threaded barrel, collapsable or retractible stocks, barrel shrouds, or permanent bipod mounts. Then when you own a rife that complies with this regulation, the liberals accuse you of "circumventing" their own ludicrust law. This law not only did not affect crime, but does nothing but restrict the lawful citizen in his second amendment rights.

Democrats and liberals in our state wanted to give cell phones and cell phone service to homeless people so they could be called for job interviews and so they could get voicemails from the government as to when their direct deposit government funding was in their checking accounts.

Our democrat governor wanted to make the possession of a metalic cartridge primer a felony, unless it was possessed in conjunction with a single shot rifle or shot gun.

Kerry has no damm business in the White House and liberals can all get in a boat and suck d1ck all the way to some other continent as far as I am concerned with their gay marriage initiatives and all the rest of their crap on a stick agendas.
 
Kerry has no damm business in the White House and liberals can all get in a boat and suck d1ck all the way to some other continent as far as I am concerned with their gay marriage initiatives and all the rest of their crap on a stick agendas.

You are a genius. Anybody who believe this - that EITHER side is just evil and that the other is virtuous - is just simply an idiot....not thinking at all.

You have so much to offer the world.

Or you are just taking up my oxygen/
 
Satan said:
Originally posted by Timebuilder
Sometimes, I don't even imgine such as succinct example blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah blah blahblah blah blah blah blah


did you get a Webster at the last church raffle?



get a job, man

There is a very important point to be made in your post, evil one.

All the "blah, blah, blah" that is added to the beginning of the quote also supports what I said the other day. In order for you to try to make your point, you resort to changing or adding to the discussion in a way that tries to turn away, add an insult, and change the subject at hand.

When did I get a "webster?" When I was in third grade.

I was hoping you'd bring something to this discussion. I'm disappointed.
 
Satan/350 driver-

I DEFY you to rebut that first post point-by-point without using a single bit of name-calling.

All you ever do is spout opinion, and attack people personally.

Even if you were right, which you may be assured you are NOT, you are eminently unprepared to convince others.

Facts are for grown-ups. Cute sayings are for kids and liberals.

Thank you for once again, proving my point.

And satan, read the last book of the bible to find out what happens to your namesake.

THUMP!
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top